Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 17:02:56 +0000
From: Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>
To: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: peterz@infradead.org, mingo@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Morten.Rasmussen@arm.com, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
        kernellwp@gmail.com, yuyang.du@intel.com, umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2 v2] sched: improve spread of tasks during fork
Message-ID: <20161128170256.GB20785@codeblueprint.co.uk>
References: <1480088073-11642-1-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1480088073-11642-1-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24+41 (02bc14ed1569) (2015-08-30)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 806
Lines: 19

On Fri, 25 Nov, at 04:34:31PM, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> This patchset was originally 1 patch but a perf regression happened during the rebase.
> The patch 01 fixes the perf regression discovered in tip/sched/core during the
> rebase.
> The patch 02 is the rebase of the patch that fixes the regression raised by
> Matt Fleming [1].
> 
> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/10/18/206
> 
> Vincent Guittot (2):
>   sched: fix find_idlest_group for fork
>   sched: use load_avg for selecting idlest group
> 
>  kernel/sched/fair.c | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
>  1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

FYI, I'm running both of these patches through the SUSE performance
testing grid right now. I'll let you know as soon as I have results
(should be in the next few days).