MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20161128170256.GB20785@codeblueprint.co.uk>
References: <1480088073-11642-1-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.org> <20161128170256.GB20785@codeblueprint.co.uk>
From: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 18:20:17 +0100
Message-ID: <CAKfTPtDpXinEE9d+HQNjEDSrrSQONxpbQ8rOgDm7eSrJd6QgDw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2 v2] sched: improve spread of tasks during fork
To: Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Morten Rasmussen <Morten.Rasmussen@arm.com>,
        Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com>, Yuyang Du <yuyang.du@intel.com>,
        Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 911
Lines: 22

On 28 November 2016 at 18:02, Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk> wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Nov, at 04:34:31PM, Vincent Guittot wrote:
>> This patchset was originally 1 patch but a perf regression happened during the rebase.
>> The patch 01 fixes the perf regression discovered in tip/sched/core during the
>> rebase.
>> The patch 02 is the rebase of the patch that fixes the regression raised by
>> Matt Fleming [1].
>>
>> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/10/18/206
>>
>> Vincent Guittot (2):
>>   sched: fix find_idlest_group for fork
>>   sched: use load_avg for selecting idlest group
>>
>>  kernel/sched/fair.c | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
>>  1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> FYI, I'm running both of these patches through the SUSE performance
> testing grid right now. I'll let you know as soon as I have results
> (should be in the next few days).

Thanks