Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932658AbcK1VHr (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Nov 2016 16:07:47 -0500 Received: from mail-ua0-f178.google.com ([209.85.217.178]:36258 "EHLO mail-ua0-f178.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932141AbcK1VHe (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Nov 2016 16:07:34 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <5489387.Z7UgOxivrY@wuerfel> References: <20161122213245.17955-1-code@mmayer.net> <8526810.ogr5uYm3lV@wuerfel> <5489387.Z7UgOxivrY@wuerfel> From: Markus Mayer Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 13:07:27 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] cpufreq: brcmstb-cpufreq: CPUfreq driver for older Broadcom STB SoCs To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Markus Mayer , Viresh Kumar , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Power Management List , Broadcom Kernel List , Linux Kernel Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2911 Lines: 72 On 28 November 2016 at 12:58, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Monday, November 28, 2016 9:12:05 AM CET Markus Mayer wrote: >> >> +static int get_frequencies(const struct cpufreq_policy *policy, >> >> + unsigned int *vco_freq, unsigned int *cpu_freq, >> >> + unsigned int *scb_freq) >> >> +{ >> >> + struct clk *cpu_ndiv_int, *sw_scb; >> >> + >> >> + cpu_ndiv_int = __clk_lookup(BRCMSTB_CLK_NDIV_INT); >> >> + if (!cpu_ndiv_int) >> >> + return -ENODEV; >> >> + >> >> + sw_scb = __clk_lookup(BRCMSTB_CLK_SW_SCB); >> >> + if (!sw_scb) >> >> + return -ENODEV; >> >> + >> >> + /* return frequencies in kHz */ >> >> + *vco_freq = clk_get_rate(cpu_ndiv_int) / 1000; >> >> + *cpu_freq = clk_get_rate(policy->clk) / 1000; >> >> + *scb_freq = clk_get_rate(sw_scb) / 1000; >> >> + >> >> + return 0; >> >> +} >> > >> > You really can't do this: >> > >> > ../drivers/cpufreq/brcmstb-cpufreq.c: In function 'get_frequencies': >> > ../drivers/cpufreq/brcmstb-cpufreq.c:71:17: error: implicit declaration of function '__clk_lookup';did you mean 'key_lookup'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] >> > cpu_ndiv_int = __clk_lookup(BRCMSTB_CLK_NDIV_INT); >> > ^~~~~~~~~~~~ >> > >> > __clk_lookup is an internal API for the clk providers. >> > >> > In particular, relying on undocumented internal names of the >> > clk provider in a device driver is inappropriate. >> >> What compiler are you using? I didn't get any warnings. Otherwise I >> would have known right away that something isn't right. > > This is a randconfig build with CONFIG_COMMON_CLK=n. There is a different > problem with COMMON_CLK=y and the cpufreq driver as a loadable module, > where the symbol causes a link error. > > I did not get any warnings either, these are both hard errors. > >> >> +static const struct of_device_id brcmstb_cpufreq_match[] = { >> >> + { .compatible = BRCMSTB_DT_CPU_CLK_CTRL }, >> >> + { } >> >> +}; >> >> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(platform, brcmstb_cpufreq_match); >> > >> > This is a simple typo, also causing the build to fail: >> > >> > FATAL: drivers/cpufreq/brcmstb-cpufreq: sizeof(struct platform_device_id)=24 is not a modulo of the size of section __mod_platform___device_table=392. >> >> What is the typo, if I may ask. Again strange, since the build doesn't >> fail for me. What was the configuration you used? > > MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE() is only used when building a loadable module, > e.g. in allmodconfig. > > MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(platform, ...) is for 'struct platform_device_id'. > You need to use MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, ...) for 'struct of_device_id'. Got it. Thanks. I fixed this problem and the IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM_BRCMSTB_AVS_CPUFREQ) issue in my copy. I'll need to look a bit more what I can do instead of calling __clk_lookup(). Regards, -Markus