Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756800AbcK2J0x (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Nov 2016 04:26:53 -0500 Received: from mga11.intel.com ([192.55.52.93]:59780 "EHLO mga11.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756777AbcK2J0m (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Nov 2016 04:26:42 -0500 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.31,715,1473145200"; d="scan'208";a="906647385" Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 11:26:31 +0200 From: Mika Westerberg To: Tin Huynh Cc: Jarkko Nikula , Andy Shevchenko , Wolfram Sang , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Loc Ho , Thang Nguyen , Phong Vo , patches Subject: Re: [PATCH V1] i2c: designware: fix wrong tx/rx fifo for ACPI Message-ID: <20161129092631.GQ1459@lahna.fi.intel.com> References: <1480390327-24562-1-git-send-email-tnhuynh@apm.com> <20161129090431.GM1459@lahna.fi.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.1 (2016-10-04) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 314 Lines: 6 On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 04:15:13PM +0700, Tin Huynh wrote: > Yes , My IP core supports 16 bytes size only . Should we get this > parameter from ACPI table instead of 32 ? What if we set the default 32 from ACPI as currently but then read the value from hardware as well and pick the smaller one of the two?