Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262106AbTELMAi (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 May 2003 08:00:38 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262110AbTELMAi (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 May 2003 08:00:38 -0400 Received: from carisma.slowglass.com ([195.224.96.167]:63757 "EHLO phoenix.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262106AbTELMAh (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 May 2003 08:00:37 -0400 Date: Mon, 12 May 2003 13:13:19 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Frank Cusack Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, paulus@samba.org Subject: Re: MPPE in kernel? Message-ID: <20030512131319.A27217@infradead.org> Mail-Followup-To: Christoph Hellwig , Frank Cusack , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, paulus@samba.org References: <20030512045929.C29781@google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20030512045929.C29781@google.com>; from fcusack@fcusack.com on Mon, May 12, 2003 at 04:59:29AM -0700 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 845 Lines: 17 On Mon, May 12, 2003 at 04:59:29AM -0700, Frank Cusack wrote: > I really want is for the changes to ppp_generic.c to be included. > It's not so much fun to have to maintain patches. The changes required > are generic, don't require crypto, and are generally uneventful. Getting > the crypto bits and the mppe compressor itself included would just be > a bonus. What about posting those changes for review? If they are clean and your arcfour implementation firts into the crypto API I guess it could go into 2.5. For 2.4.22 it sounds okay too if the 2.5ish crypto API goes in as Davem mentioned. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/