Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755120AbcK2KyY (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Nov 2016 05:54:24 -0500 Received: from lelnx194.ext.ti.com ([198.47.27.80]:17367 "EHLO lelnx194.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751991AbcK2KyT (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Nov 2016 05:54:19 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] ARM: dts: da850-lcdk: specify the maximum pixel clock rate for tilcdc To: Bartosz Golaszewski , Kevin Hilman , Michael Turquette , Rob Herring , Frank Rowand , Mark Rutland , Peter Ujfalusi , Russell King References: <1480335328-4010-1-git-send-email-bgolaszewski@baylibre.com> <1480335328-4010-3-git-send-email-bgolaszewski@baylibre.com> CC: LKML , arm-soc , linux-drm , linux-devicetree , Jyri Sarha , Tomi Valkeinen , David Airlie , Laurent Pinchart From: Sekhar Nori Message-ID: <4f2a02c4-062f-6faf-1024-2a8718a9701f@ti.com> Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 16:23:23 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1480335328-4010-3-git-send-email-bgolaszewski@baylibre.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1195 Lines: 35 On Monday 28 November 2016 05:45 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > Due to memory throughput constraints any display mode for which the > pixel clock rate exceeds the recommended value of 37500 KHz must be > filtered out. I think there might be more reasons than memory throughput constraints for the reasoning behind 37.5Mhz cap on pixel clock. Why not just refer to the datasheet section that places this constraint so we know its a hardware restriction. > > Specify the max-pixelclock property for the display node for > da850-lcdk. > > Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski > --- > arch/arm/boot/dts/da850-lcdk.dts | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/da850-lcdk.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/da850-lcdk.dts > index d864f11..1283263 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/da850-lcdk.dts > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/da850-lcdk.dts > @@ -285,6 +285,7 @@ > > &display { > status = "okay"; > + max-pixelclock = <37500>; Should this not be in da850.dtsi since its an SoC imposed constraint? If a board needs narrower constraint, it can override it. But I guess most well designed boards will just hit the SoC constraint. Thanks, Sekhar