Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 13:30:23 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>
Cc: Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>, mingo@kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
        kernellwp@gmail.com, yuyang.du@intel.com, umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 v2] sched: fix find_idlest_group for fork
Message-ID: <20161129123023.GI3092@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
References: <1480088073-11642-1-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
 <1480088073-11642-2-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
 <20161129105758.GA1716@e105550-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
 <20161129114243.GF3092@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <20161129114419.GC20785@codeblueprint.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20161129114419.GC20785@codeblueprint.co.uk>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23.1 (2014-03-12)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 580
Lines: 14

On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 11:44:19AM +0000, Matt Fleming wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Nov, at 12:42:43PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > 
> > IIRC, and my pounding head really doesn't remember much, the comment
> > reads like we need the large fudge factor because hackbench. That is,
> > hackbench would like this test to go away, but others benchmarks will
> > tank.
> > 
> > Now, if only I would've written down which benchmarks that were.. awell.
>  
> Going out on a limb: Chris' schbench?

No, that actually wants that test taken out as well. It might have been
things like sysbench or so.