Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756379AbcK2UHZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Nov 2016 15:07:25 -0500 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:40314 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755435AbcK2UHQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Nov 2016 15:07:16 -0500 Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 12:07:11 -0800 From: "Paul E. McKenney" To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Petr Mladek , Josh Poimboeuf , Vince Weaver , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Ingo Molnar , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , "dvyukov@google.com" Subject: Re: perf: fuzzer BUG: KASAN: stack-out-of-bounds in __unwind_start Reply-To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com References: <20161128215411.fkis7bbimjy4v4j7@treble> <20161129004021.GL3924@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20161129055241.6dy2dt4q4ptazk2s@treble> <20161129124323.GJ3092@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20161129151004.GU3924@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20161129162920.GF21230@pathway.suse.cz> <20161129171038.GN3092@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20161129193935.GE3924@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20161129195204.GG3045@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20161129195204.GG3045@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER x-cbid: 16112920-8235-0000-0000-000009B8899E X-IBM-SpamModules-Scores: X-IBM-SpamModules-Versions: BY=3.00006164; HX=3.00000240; KW=3.00000007; PH=3.00000004; SC=3.00000193; SDB=6.00787016; UDB=6.00380648; IPR=6.00564702; BA=6.00004928; NDR=6.00000001; ZLA=6.00000005; ZF=6.00000009; ZB=6.00000000; ZP=6.00000000; ZH=6.00000000; ZU=6.00000002; MB=3.00013484; XFM=3.00000011; UTC=2016-11-29 20:07:13 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 16112920-8236-0000-0000-000036DBD520 Message-Id: <20161129200711.GF3924@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:,, definitions=2016-11-29_05:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1609300000 definitions=main-1611290333 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 906 Lines: 21 On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 08:52:04PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 11:39:35AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 06:10:38PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > > It mostly works, most of the time, and that seems to be what Linus > > > wants, since its really the best we can have given the constraints. But > > > for debugging, when you have a UART, it totally blows. > > > > UART??? They still make those things??? ;-) > > Yes, most computer like devices actually have them, trouble is, most > consumer devices don't have the pins exposed. Luckily most server class > hardware still does. > > And they're absolutely _awesome_ for debugging; getting data out is a > matter of trivial MMIO poll loops. Rock solid stuff. They very clearly need to bring the baud rate into the current millenium, many tens of Mbaud at the -very- least. Thanx, Paul