Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262493AbTELSDF (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 May 2003 14:03:05 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262409AbTELSCZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 May 2003 14:02:25 -0400 Received: from mcomail01.maxtor.com ([134.6.76.15]:50445 "EHLO mcomail01.maxtor.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262427AbTELRqH (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 May 2003 13:46:07 -0400 Message-ID: <785F348679A4D5119A0C009027DE33C102E0D31A@mcoexc04.mlm.maxtor.com> From: "Mudama, Eric" To: "'Jens Axboe'" , Oleg Drokin Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , Alan Cox , Oliver Neukum , lkhelp@rekl.yi.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: RE: 2.5.69, IDE TCQ can't be enabled Date: Mon, 12 May 2003 11:58:10 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2287 Lines: 59 The only difference between SATA TCQ and PATA TCQ is that in PATA TCQ, the drive doesn't report the active tag bitmap back to the host after each command. Other than that they are functionally identical to my understanding. (Yes, there are options like first-party DMA, but these are not requirements) Personally I'd like to see the option stay in there as experimental, it helps us drive folks test stuff when we can just flip an option off/on to get that functionality. --eric -----Original Message----- From: Jens Axboe [mailto:axboe@suse.de] Sent: Monday, May 12, 2003 7:24 AM To: Oleg Drokin Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz; Alan Cox; Oliver Neukum; lkhelp@rekl.yi.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.5.69, IDE TCQ can't be enabled On Mon, May 12 2003, Oleg Drokin wrote: > Hello! > > On Mon, May 12, 2003 at 03:16:17PM +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > > > > Just a note that we have found TCQ unusable on our IBM drives and we had > > > > some reports about TCQ unusable on some WD drives. > > > > Unusable means severe FS corruptions starting from mount. > > > > So if your FSs will suddenly start to break, start looking for cause with > > > > disabling TCQ, please. > > > I can confirm that. This drive Model=IBM-DTLA-307045, FwRev=TX6OA60A, > > > SerialNo=YMCYMT3Y229 has eaten my filesystem with TCQ on 2.5.69 > > TCQ is marked EXPERIMENTAL and is known to be broken. > > Probably it should be marked DANGEROUS or removed? > > How do you think people will test code that is removed? > Or do you mean that nobody plans to look at this ever? > I remember that Jens Axboe promised to take a look at it some > months ago. Yeah, that is correct. OTOH, it's not a great loss. The SATA tcq will be much better, ide tcq is a really horrible beast. -- Jens Axboe - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/