Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964873AbcK3Ouw (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Nov 2016 09:50:52 -0500 Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([184.105.139.130]:60662 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932242AbcK3Ouo (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Nov 2016 09:50:44 -0500 Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 09:50:42 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <20161130.095042.1941413912137147866.davem@davemloft.net> To: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Cc: maan@tuebingen.mpg.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah.kh@samsung.com, patches@kernelci.org, ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk, stable@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com, alexander.h.duyck@intel.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.4 00/21] 4.4.36-stable review From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <20161130135327.GA1283@kroah.com> References: <20161130092654.890709900@linuxfoundation.org> <20161130134619.GA14154@tuebingen.mpg.de> <20161130135327.GA1283@kroah.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.7 on Emacs 24.5 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.12 (shards.monkeyblade.net [149.20.54.216]); Wed, 30 Nov 2016 05:51:20 -0800 (PST) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1013 Lines: 27 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 14:53:27 +0100 > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 02:46:19PM +0100, Andre Noll wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 30, 10:27, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote >> >> > Responses should be made by Fri Dec 2 09:26:46 UTC 2016. >> >> If you haven't done so already, could you please add c9b8af13 >> (flow_dissect: call init_default_flow_dissectors() earlier) for >> 4.4.37? >> >> It fixes a regression introduced in 4.4.34 which makes systems >> unbootable for us. We are currently running that patch on top of >> 4.4.35 and I can confirm that it fixes the issue. > > I wait for networking stable patches to come from the networking > maintainer, as he batches them up and runs them through testing before > forwarding them on. > > That being said, this looks like an "easy" one to take, Davie, any > objection to me queueing this up now? I was waiting for it to hit Linus's tree which happened just a day or two ago. But feel free to take it in directly, sure.