Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262656AbTELUde (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 May 2003 16:33:34 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262694AbTELUde (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 May 2003 16:33:34 -0400 Received: from amsfep11-int.chello.nl ([213.46.243.20]:35357 "EHLO amsfep11-int.chello.nl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262656AbTELUdd (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 May 2003 16:33:33 -0400 From: Jos Hulzink To: "STK" , "'linux-kernel'" Subject: Re: [RFC] How to fix MPS 1.4 + ACPI behaviour ? Date: Mon, 12 May 2003 22:50:32 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.5 Cc: "'Zwane Mwaikambo'" References: <000c01c318c6$c0804990$0200a8c0@QUASARLAND> In-Reply-To: <000c01c318c6$c0804990$0200a8c0@QUASARLAND> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200305122250.32897.josh@stack.nl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 797 Lines: 20 On Monday 12 May 2003 22:40, STK wrote: > Hi, > > If no Multiple APIC Description Table (MADT) is described, in this case > the _PIC method can be used to tell the bios to return the right table > (PIC or APIC routing table). > > In this case, if the MPS table describes matches the ACPI APIC table > (this is the case, because the ACPI APIC table is built from the MPS > table), you do not need to remap all IRQs. So, it's more or less a bug in the ACPI code that should do some things when no MADT is dectected ? Or do I understand you wrong ? Jos - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/