Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757808AbcLAAvf (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Nov 2016 19:51:35 -0500 Received: from ms.lwn.net ([45.79.88.28]:33852 "EHLO ms.lwn.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755498AbcLAAvd (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Nov 2016 19:51:33 -0500 Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 17:51:29 -0700 From: Jonathan Corbet To: Silvio Fricke Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Ming Lei , "Luis R . Rodriguez" , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jani Nikula , Peter Zijlstra , Daniel Vetter Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] core-api ReST: assoc_array, atomic_ops, local_ops Message-ID: <20161130175129.5ab7158f@lwn.net> In-Reply-To: References: Organization: LWN.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.14.0 (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 871 Lines: 23 On Mon, 28 Nov 2016 18:30:52 +0100 Silvio Fricke wrote: > Some more ReSTification of core-api's: assoc_array, atomic_ops and local_ops. A > fourth patch removes a warning about a bullet list without ending at > firmware_class.c OK, I've merged patches 1-3. Peter, if you ever want to edit atomic_ops, just send it meward when you're done and I'll deal with any formatting issues. Silvio, if you wanted to take this further, the assoc_array code is nicely decorated with kerneldoc comments; using those in the documentation would be a nice thing. There are some kerneldoc comments for the atomic functions, but that seems rather more erratic. Part 4 (firmware_class.c) is a bit off my turf, so I don't think I can apply it. From what I can tell looking at the history, Andrew Morton might be a logical target for that patch. Thanks, jon