Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2016 13:43:18 +0200
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
To: Nayna <nayna@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: tpmdd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, peterhuewe@gmx.de,
        tpmdd@selhorst.net, jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com,
        linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] tpm: add securityfs support for TPM 2.0 firmware
 event log
Message-ID: <20161201114318.6wqxpqmhiqimeobh@intel.com>
References: <1480164339-26409-1-git-send-email-nayna@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
 <1480164339-26409-3-git-send-email-nayna@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
 <20161126154755.56goahgkjf5n67ay@intel.com>
 <583F0554.1030107@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <583F0554.1030107@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo
User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.2-neo (2016-08-21)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1389
Lines: 32

On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 10:29:00PM +0530, Nayna wrote:
> 
> 
> On 11/26/2016 09:17 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 07:45:39AM -0500, Nayna Jain wrote:
> > > Unlike the device driver support for TPM 1.2, the TPM 2.0 does
> > > not support the securityfs pseudo files for displaying the
> > > firmware event log.
> > > 
> > > This patch enables support for providing the TPM 2.0 event log in
> > > binary form. TPM 2.0 event log supports a crypto agile format that
> > > records multiple digests, which is different from TPM 1.2. This
> > > patch enables the tpm_bios_log_setup for TPM 2.0  and adds the
> > > event log parser which understand the TPM 2.0 crypto agile format.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Nayna Jain <nayna@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > 
> > I would not rush with new patch set versions as long as the testing is
> > almost completely lacking. I didn't even have time to read the previous
> > version properly before this came out.
> 
> Sure Jarkko. My apologies for multiple versions. I will wait for testing,
> before posting my next version.

You could send now a new version because probably anyone who wants
to review your patches has had a chance to look at it. My point was
that you wait for at least few days.

Maybe Jason could help testing your patches. I don't know when I have
time to setup environment. He had OF environment available.

/Jarkko