Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262932AbTELXU4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 May 2003 19:20:56 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262933AbTELXU4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 May 2003 19:20:56 -0400 Received: from chaos.analogic.com ([204.178.40.224]:54408 "EHLO chaos.analogic.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262932AbTELXUz (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 May 2003 19:20:55 -0400 Date: Mon, 12 May 2003 19:36:49 -0400 (EDT) From: "Richard B. Johnson" X-X-Sender: root@chaos Reply-To: root@chaos.analogic.com To: Felipe Alfaro Solana cc: Russell King , Alan Cox , Paul Fulghum , David Hinds , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: PCMCIA 2.5.X sleeping from illegal context In-Reply-To: <1052781365.1185.5.camel@teapot.felipe-alfaro.com> Message-ID: References: <1052775331.1995.49.camel@diemos> <1052773631.31825.18.camel@dhcp22.swansea.linux.org.uk> <20030512233151.B17227@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <1052781365.1185.5.camel@teapot.felipe-alfaro.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1426 Lines: 33 On Mon, 13 May 2003, Felipe Alfaro Solana wrote: > On Tue, 2003-05-13 at 00:31, Russell King wrote: > > > Does this still happen with all the patches Russell King posted > > > that everyone else is ignoring ? > > > > I'm in the process of putting the patch in my outgoing patch queue > > for Linus, otherwise we're not going to make any forward progress. > > Well, your patches do work pretty well for me... I've been playing > extensively with PCMCIA today, mainly with my 3Com CardBus NIC which has > really strange TX slowdown problems, by plugging and unplugging it over > and over again, loading and unloading the 3c59x.ko module and so on. So > at least, we're making some progress. Could somebody please change the error message? Although everybody seems to want to be a lawyer, even lawyers don't make law. Certainly Software Engineers don't. The correct word is 'invalid', not 'illegal'. Yes, I know there is a 30-year history of the use of that word in Unix, but it's wrong. Only governments make law. Cheers, Dick Johnson Penguin : Linux version 2.4.20 on an i686 machine (797.90 BogoMips). Why is the government concerned about the lunatic fringe? Think about it. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/