Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759588AbcLAOTe (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Dec 2016 09:19:34 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:48274 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755026AbcLAOTc (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Dec 2016 09:19:32 -0500 Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903 From: David Howells In-Reply-To: References: <148059537897.31612.9461043954611464597.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <148059543222.31612.3648801189087582676.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, Linux Kernel Mailing List , gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, minyard@acm.org, Linux PM , Viresh Kumar , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, keyrings@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/39] Annotate hardware config module parameters in drivers/cpufreq/ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <24568.1480601969.1@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2016 14:19:29 +0000 Message-ID: <24569.1480601969@warthog.procyon.org.uk> X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.28]); Thu, 01 Dec 2016 14:19:31 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 286 Lines: 9 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Whom do you expect to apply this? I can try bearding Linus. All of the second+ patches depend on the first, so if nothing else, I need to get that one in the next merge window and then send the patches to individual maintainers. David