Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2016 16:49:58 +0100
From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org>
To: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: Silvio Fricke <silvio.fricke@gmail.com>, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
        Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com>,
        "Luis R . Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] core-api ReST: assoc_array, atomic_ops, local_ops
Message-ID: <20161201154957.GT1402@wotan.suse.de>
References: <cover.9b80912a8cfb55dfb55d1434ab1811fa5211eb9c.1480085951.git-series.silvio.fricke@gmail.com>
 <cover.a9f60820422cef425c9ebeb73a41c5378a43ce88.1480354075.git-series.silvio.fricke@gmail.com>
 <20161130175129.5ab7158f@lwn.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20161130175129.5ab7158f@lwn.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.0 (2016-04-01)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 496
Lines: 11

On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 05:51:29PM -0700, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> Part 4 (firmware_class.c) is a bit off my turf, so I don't think I can
> apply it.  From what I can tell looking at the history, Andrew Morton
> might be a logical target for that patch.

I'll review that patch, as I've recently taken up helping with maintenance
for firmware_class. Provided its fine it could go through you Jonathan as
I am not aware of other documentation changes in the pipeline. Will review
shortly.

  Luis