Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2016 23:47:17 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@kernel.org>, Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
        Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
        Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>,
        Tyler Baicar <tbaicar@codeaurora.org>,
        Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@arm.com>, Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>,
        Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ACPI / APEI: Fix NMI notification handling
Message-ID: <20161201224717.4tkp5glpib5fhusv@pd.tnic>
References: <20161129193624.krjz2bpinl2ioi7o@pd.tnic>
 <3848089.cIkXoRipBG@aspire.rjw.lan>
 <20161201215149.fvb3ki77det7bnjq@pd.tnic>
 <10086382.uM7IovncFW@aspire.rjw.lan>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <10086382.uM7IovncFW@aspire.rjw.lan>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20161014 (1.7.1)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 526
Lines: 15

On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 11:29:45PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Well, there's another ARM-related patch touching APEI.
> 
> I guess whoever takes this one should also take the other one and
> honestly they can go in via any tree as far as I'm concerned, I'm just trying to
> avoid merge clashes here. :-)

Maybe have ARM-folk ACK the other one and take both through your ACPI
tree? They both do have ACPI in common :-)

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.