Reply-To: shuah@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] Tests for sync infrastructure
References: <20160921211205.22657-1-emilio.lopez@collabora.co.uk>
 <20161019124954.29232-1-emilio.lopez@collabora.co.uk>
 <39b7b048-e8fb-87d3-6663-53a6ec82b5d9@kernel.org>
To: =?UTF-8?Q?Emilio_L=c3=b3pez?= <emilio.lopez@collabora.co.uk>
Cc: devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk,
        riandrews@android.com, daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch,
        John.C.Harrison@Intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, ghackmann@google.com,
        robdclark@gmail.com, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
        maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com, daniels@collabora.com,
        arve@android.com, emil.l.velikov@gmail.com, mpe@ellerman.id.au,
        Shuah Khan <shuahkh@osg.samsung.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
From: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Message-ID: <2857d05a-2653-b490-7a0d-993f6859c7a4@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2016 07:08:52 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/45.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <39b7b048-e8fb-87d3-6663-53a6ec82b5d9@kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1124
Lines: 34

On 12/01/2016 06:17 PM, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 10/19/2016 06:49 AM, Emilio López wrote:
>> Hello everyone,
>>
>> This is a series of tests to exercise the sync kernel infrastructure. It is
>> meant to be a test suite for the work Gustavo has been doing to destage it.
>>
>> These tests were originally part of a battery of tests shipping with
>> Android's libsync that were rewritten to use the new userspace interfaces.
>>
>> This is the second iteration of the test suite. Main changes over v1 are
>> a reworked Makefile and small code style fixes.
>>
>> If you are testing this on v4.9-rc1, do note that the last test will
>> currently fail due to a regression[0].
> 
> Hi Emilio,
> 
> Thanks. I will apply these to linux-kselftest next for 4.10-rc1
> 
> -- Shuah
>>
>> As usual, all comments are welcome.
>>

Hi Emilio,

Applied to linux-kselftest next. Could you take a look at the output
and see if it can be refined. Does [BAD] mean the test failed? Results
could refined to help user understand if a test failed or not clearly.
This can be done in a separate patch as a fix in one of the 4.01-rcs

thanks,
-- Shuah