Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751895AbcLCKWl (ORCPT ); Sat, 3 Dec 2016 05:22:41 -0500 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:41624 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750833AbcLCKWk (ORCPT ); Sat, 3 Dec 2016 05:22:40 -0500 Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2016 11:22:47 +0100 From: Greg KH To: Chinmay VS Cc: elder@kernel.org, johan@kernel.org, pure.logic@nexus-software.ie, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: greybus: Fix macro definition Message-ID: <20161203102247.GA15098@kroah.com> References: <1480759879-9646-1-git-send-email-cvs@nvidia.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1480759879-9646-1-git-send-email-cvs@nvidia.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.1 (2016-10-04) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1134 Lines: 31 On Sat, Dec 03, 2016 at 03:41:19PM +0530, Chinmay VS wrote: > From: ChinmayVS > > Macros with multiple statements should be enclosed in a do - while loop > > Signed-off-by: ChinmayVS > --- > drivers/staging/greybus/loopback.c | 4 +++- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/greybus/loopback.c b/drivers/staging/greybus/loopback.c > index 7882306..39f0a25 100644 > --- a/drivers/staging/greybus/loopback.c > +++ b/drivers/staging/greybus/loopback.c > @@ -177,9 +177,11 @@ static ssize_t name##_avg_show(struct device *dev, \ > static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(name##_avg) > > #define gb_loopback_stats_attrs(field) \ > +do { \ > gb_loopback_ro_stats_attr(field, min, u); \ > gb_loopback_ro_stats_attr(field, max, u); \ > - gb_loopback_ro_avg_attr(field) > + gb_loopback_ro_avg_attr(field) \ > +} while (0) > > #define gb_loopback_attr(field, type) \ > static ssize_t field##_show(struct device *dev, \ Always build test your changes so you don't get a grumpy maintainer yelling at you for not test-building your patches...