Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751400AbcLCStb (ORCPT ); Sat, 3 Dec 2016 13:49:31 -0500 Received: from proxima.lasnet.de ([78.47.171.185]:53954 "EHLO proxima.lasnet.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750795AbcLCSt3 (ORCPT ); Sat, 3 Dec 2016 13:49:29 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: pxa: ezx: fix a910 camera data To: Antonio Ospite References: <20161124162955.3887066-1-arnd@arndb.de> <87eg1zqqub.fsf@belgarion.home> <20161203175513.499a3affbb3e4a0640997f82@ao2.it> Cc: Robert Jarzmik , Arnd Bergmann , Daniel Ribeiro , Stefan Schmidt , Harald Welte , Daniel Mack , Haojian Zhuang , Thierry Reding , "openezx-devel@lists.openezx.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" From: Stefan Schmidt Message-ID: <08f2cefa-451e-d608-6242-bf1d578c1fc5@datenfreihafen.org> Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2016 19:49:24 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20161203175513.499a3affbb3e4a0640997f82@ao2.it> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3731 Lines: 93 Hello. On 03.12.2016 17:55, Antonio Ospite wrote: > On Sat, 26 Nov 2016 00:30:52 +0100 > Stefan Schmidt wrote: > >> Hello. >> > > Hi everyone, > >> On 25.11.2016 20:53, Robert Jarzmik wrote: >>> Stefan Schmidt writes: >>> >>>> Hello. >>>> >>>> On 24.11.2016 17:29, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >>>>> The camera_supply_dummy_device definition is shared between a780 and a910, >>>>> but only provided when the first is enabled and fails to build for a >>>>> configuration with only a910: >>>>> >>>>> arch/arm/mach-pxa/ezx.c:1097:3: error: 'camera_supply_dummy_device' undeclared here (not in a function) >>>>> >>>>> This moves the definition into its own section. >>>>> >>>>> Fixes: 6c1b417adc8f ("ARM: pxa: ezx: use the new pxa_camera platform_data") >>>>> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann >>>>> --- >>>>> arch/arm/mach-pxa/ezx.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------- >>>> >>>> I wonder what we should do with ezx.c. >>>> >>>> As far as I know neither Daniel nor Harald or myself are doing anything >>>> with this devices anymore. Besides a basic compile test having an ack or >>>> reviewed by from our side is a bit worthless. :/ >>>> >>>> I should still have some of these phones around in a box somewhere. If >>>> there is someone with a good motivation and time to take over on this >>>> platform we will find a way to get the person this devices. >>>> >>>> Any takers? Robert? I guess you are already overloaded but you might >>>> also have an interest. Worth asking :) >>> Oh yes, I'm very interested in your box. Besides I really like old platforms >>> :) >> >> >> Great! I should have at least 3 or 4 different devices from the EZX >> platform around. I will go and search for the box over the weekend :) >> >>>> In the case nobody wants to pick up here what would you consider the >>>> bets way forward? I could send a patch removing ezx platform support >>>> from the kernel (basically ezx.c plus build support) or I can send a >>>> patch marking it at least orphan in MAINTAINERS. Let me know what you think. >>>> >>>> Daniel, Harald, if one of you is still interested in these and what to >>>> pick up the work again, please speak up now. :) >>> Unless another maintainer steps in, you can submit a patch to transfer the >>> maintainance onto me, and we'll see off mailing lists how we could arange the >>> boards transfer. >> >> I cc'ed another developer who did a lot of work regarding EZX. >> >> Antonio, as you can see from the mail above we are pondering what who >> will maintain the ezx platform in the kernel going forward. Neither >> Daniel, Harald or me is going to do so. If you have time, interest and >> motivation to do so please speak up. I know life moved on and you ahve >> other projects and interests so do not feel pressured here. Just say no >> if you have no interest. Robert already agreed to act as a fallback so >> we would still be safe. :) >> > > I still use a Motorola A1200 with the original EZX stack as my main > phone (and that tells something about how much I use a phone...) hehe :) > however I haven't touched any OpenEZX stuff in a while. > > I don't think I am going to play with these devices anytime soon, but I > can provide Robert any info he may need about OpenEZX, the development > tools and the out-of-tree patches required to make the phones somewhat > usable. Great. I think this will be a great help for Robert when he tries to get things going. Thanks a lot! Robert, please send me your address details off list so we can arrange for the device shipping. I will send a patch transferring the maintainership for the EZX platform over to you in the next days. regards Stefan Schmidt