Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751792AbcLEJEx (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Dec 2016 04:04:53 -0500 Received: from lelnx193.ext.ti.com ([198.47.27.77]:25565 "EHLO lelnx193.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751127AbcLEJEr (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Dec 2016 04:04:47 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] ARM: da850: fix da850_set_pll0rate() To: Bartosz Golaszewski , Kevin Hilman , Michael Turquette , Peter Ujfalusi , Russell King , Viresh Kumar , Boris Brezillon , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Richard Weinberger , David Woodhouse , Brian Norris , Marek Vasut , Cyrille Pitchen References: <1480693134-31324-1-git-send-email-bgolaszewski@baylibre.com> <1480693134-31324-4-git-send-email-bgolaszewski@baylibre.com> CC: LKML , arm-soc , From: Sekhar Nori Message-ID: <130825f1-5c8f-f6bc-1f27-929ff591a9c3@ti.com> Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2016 14:15:39 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1480693134-31324-4-git-send-email-bgolaszewski@baylibre.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2151 Lines: 53 On Friday 02 December 2016 09:08 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > This function is broken - its second argument is an index to the freq > table, not the requested clock rate in Hz. It leads to an oops when > called from clk_set_rate() since this argument isn't bounds checked > either. > > Fix it by iterating over the array of supported frequencies and > selecting a one that matches or returning -EINVAL for unsupported > rates. > > Also: update the davinci cpufreq driver. It's the only user of this > clock and currently it passes the cpufreq table index to > clk_set_rate(), which is confusing. Make it pass the requested clock > rate in Hz. > > Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski > --- > arch/arm/mach-davinci/da850.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++---- > drivers/cpufreq/davinci-cpufreq.c | 2 +- > 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/da850.c b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/da850.c > index a55101c..92e3303 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/da850.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/da850.c > @@ -1179,14 +1179,28 @@ static int da850_set_armrate(struct clk *clk, unsigned long index) > return clk_set_rate(pllclk, index); > } > > -static int da850_set_pll0rate(struct clk *clk, unsigned long index) > +static int da850_set_pll0rate(struct clk *clk, unsigned long rate) > { > - unsigned int prediv, mult, postdiv; > - struct da850_opp *opp; > struct pll_data *pll = clk->pll_data; > + struct cpufreq_frequency_table *freq; > + unsigned int prediv, mult, postdiv; > + struct da850_opp *opp = NULL; > int ret; > > - opp = (struct da850_opp *) cpufreq_info.freq_table[index].driver_data; > + for (freq = da850_freq_table; > + freq->frequency != CPUFREQ_TABLE_END; freq++) { > + /* requested_rate is in Hz, freq->frequency is in KHz */ > + unsigned long freq_rate = freq->frequency * 1000; A small optimization here. Instead of multiplying potentially every frequency in the table by 1000, you could divide the incoming rate down to KHz. This will also avoid the need for 'freq_rate'. Should have noticed this earlier. Sorry about that. Thanks, Sekhar