Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 1 Nov 2000 17:58:22 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 1 Nov 2000 17:58:11 -0500 Received: from etpmod.phys.tue.nl ([131.155.111.35]:56075 "EHLO etpmod.phys.tue.nl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 1 Nov 2000 17:58:04 -0500 Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2000 23:57:34 +0100 From: Kurt Garloff To: "J . A . Magallon" Cc: Linux kernel list Subject: Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10 ? Message-ID: <20001101235734.D10585@garloff.etpnet.phys.tue.nl> Mail-Followup-To: Kurt Garloff , "J . A . Magallon" , Linux kernel list In-Reply-To: <20001101234058.B1598@werewolf.able.es> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20001101234058.B1598@werewolf.able.es>; from jamagallon@able.es on Wed, Nov 01, 2000 at 11:40:58PM +0100 X-Operating-System: Linux 2.2.16 i686 X-PGP-Info: on http://www.garloff.de/kurt/mykeys.pgp X-PGP-Key: 1024D/1C98774E, 1024R/CEFC9215 Organization: TUE/NL, SuSE/FRG Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Nov 01, 2000 at 11:40:58PM +0100, J . A . Magallon wrote: > I have noticed that in latest patch for 2.4.0, the global Makefile > no more tries to find a kgcc, and falls back to gcc. > I suppose because 2.7.2.3 is no more good for kernel, but still you > can use 2.91, 2.95.2 or 2.96(??). Is that a patch that leaked in > the way to test10, or is for another reason ?. kgcc is a redhat'ism. They invented this package because their 2.96 fails compiling a stable kernel. However, it's not a good idea to dist specific code into the official kernel tree. Regards, -- Kurt Garloff [Eindhoven, NL] Physics: Plasma simulations [TU Eindhoven, NL] (See mail header or public key servers for RSA and DSA public keys.) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/