Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261564AbTEMQbY (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 May 2003 12:31:24 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261807AbTEMQbU (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 May 2003 12:31:20 -0400 Received: from pc2-cwma1-4-cust86.swan.cable.ntl.com ([213.105.254.86]:44444 "EHLO lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261564AbTEMQaM (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 May 2003 12:30:12 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] in-core AFS multiplexor and PAG support From: Alan Cox To: Linus Torvalds Cc: David Howells , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, openafs-devel@openafs.org In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Organization: Message-Id: <1052840663.463.64.camel@dhcp22.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.2 (1.2.2-5) Date: 13 May 2003 16:44:24 +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 781 Lines: 18 On Maw, 2003-05-13 at 16:52, Linus Torvalds wrote: > I think the code looks pretty horrible, but I think we'll need something > like this to keep track of keys. However, I'm not sure we should make this > a new structure - I think we should make the current "tsk->user" thing > _be_ the "PAG". With something like SELinux a PAG may belong to a role not to a user even though other limits like processes probably belong to the user as a whole. How does AFS currently handle this, can two logins of the same user have seperate PAGs ? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/