Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753773AbcLFRgo (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Dec 2016 12:36:44 -0500 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:48876 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751685AbcLFRgn (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Dec 2016 12:36:43 -0500 Subject: Re: [RFC v3 05/10] iommu: Do not map reserved regions To: Eric Auger , eric.auger.pro@gmail.com, christoffer.dall@linaro.org, marc.zyngier@arm.com, alex.williamson@redhat.com, will.deacon@arm.com, joro@8bytes.org, tglx@linutronix.de, jason@lakedaemon.net, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org References: <1479215363-2898-1-git-send-email-eric.auger@redhat.com> <1479215363-2898-6-git-send-email-eric.auger@redhat.com> Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, drjones@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, pranav.sawargaonkar@gmail.com, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, punit.agrawal@arm.com, diana.craciun@nxp.com From: Robin Murphy Message-ID: Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2016 17:36:34 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1479215363-2898-6-git-send-email-eric.auger@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1175 Lines: 34 On 15/11/16 13:09, Eric Auger wrote: > As we introduced IOMMU_RESV_NOMAP and IOMMU_RESV_MSI regions, > let's prevent those new regions from being mapped. > > Signed-off-by: Eric Auger > --- > drivers/iommu/iommu.c | 3 +++ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c > index 6ee529f..a4530ad 100644 > --- a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c > +++ b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c > @@ -343,6 +343,9 @@ static int iommu_group_create_direct_mappings(struct iommu_group *group, > start = ALIGN(entry->start, pg_size); > end = ALIGN(entry->start + entry->length, pg_size); > > + if (entry->prot & IOMMU_RESV_MASK) This seems to be the only place that this mask is used, and frankly I think it's less clear than simply "(IOMMU_RESV_NOMAP | IOMMU_RESV_MSI)" would be, at which point we may as well drop the mask and special value trickery altogether. Plus, per my previous comment, if it were to be "if (entry->type != )" instead, that's about as obvious as it can get. Robin. > + continue; > + > for (addr = start; addr < end; addr += pg_size) { > phys_addr_t phys_addr; > >