Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753439AbcLFSEi (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Dec 2016 13:04:38 -0500 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([78.46.96.112]:39958 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752109AbcLFSEe (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Dec 2016 13:04:34 -0500 Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2016 19:04:27 +0100 From: Borislav Petkov To: Andy Lutomirski Cc: Andy Lutomirski , X86 ML , One Thousand Gnomes , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Brian Gerst , Matthew Whitehead Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 4/6] x86/fpu: Fix "x86/fpu: Legacy x87 FPU detected" message Message-ID: <20161206180427.ophic3u64casl7n7@pd.tnic> References: <21c7c86831db499b725f70d6603327f4ebcf09cf.1480985979.git.luto@kernel.org> <20161206092424.crarepjm2ntkfpd4@pd.tnic> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: NeoMutt/20161014 (1.7.1) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 526 Lines: 16 On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 09:59:56AM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > I did something like this for FSAVE vs FXSAVE. XSAVE has its own pile > of printouts and I don't feel like I need to add another. So frankly, replacing "legacy" with "pre-XSAVE" is not making it any clearer - it is just calling it differently. IMO. Dumping those three makes it exact. But I don't care too much about it - it is in /proc/cpuinfo anyway. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.