Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753615AbcLHENP (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Dec 2016 23:13:15 -0500 Received: from mo1502.mxl.2iij.net ([203.180.99.20]:60591 "EHLO mo.mxl.2iij.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753369AbcLHENN (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Dec 2016 23:13:13 -0500 X-MXL-Hash: 5848ddc408bdff52-df56979d209e35fbb904776f92b2c10c901432c4 From: fx IWATA NOBUO To: Shuah Khan , Andrey Konovalov CC: Greg Kroah-Hartman , Valentina Manea , Shuah Khan , "linux-usb@vger.kernel.org" , LKML , Shuah Khan Subject: RE: [PATCH] usbip: fix warning in vhci_hcd_probe/lockdep_init_map Thread-Topic: [PATCH] usbip: fix warning in vhci_hcd_probe/lockdep_init_map Thread-Index: AQHSTzHDm8PVADuBJkahYzYll8fkK6D5xhOAgAEN8ACAAneiwIAAEdWAgAAAbGA= Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2016 04:12:50 +0000 Message-ID: References: <20161205195638.7005-1-shuahkh@osg.samsung.com> <4a3b7e4f-6b5c-d9e8-f26c-1286d4e1f630@osg.samsung.com> <8167945c-36b5-1797-b220-54428d4c7869@osg.samsung.com> In-Reply-To: <8167945c-36b5-1797-b220-54428d4c7869@osg.samsung.com> Accept-Language: ja-JP, en-US Content-Language: ja-JP X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [2001:240:bb5e:1850::1:237] x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: e43cf0ea-6313-4e17-cf10-08d41f2079c5 x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:(22001);SRVR:HK2PR06MB1569; x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1;HK2PR06MB1569;7:lgf4dhHz2qXOL2uozeu8nrz46eEFpMc19Dz6TCZSVe/sxOlHrWJPFANB4SY7jD/UVZSEbA7Rg/dRtLy2Lof3Eqel6WAbAk+/hri3djPlTx0HO/8nHxhaJni8iEhGHmqzjZJlVMu+fWM/NkQgxVGspxUfZ7JRJ7mqR2pgg1AaRoTSjHTYhGdzpAHynMcw4N3g7kta3l0ci2a2n3u9tvpTwuLRYd9obEKN1hCE5VklK2PM3RXsHyD8UjMjMW+TJlI6jeJYysnTZDGGvCVLsjNLleeRyrMMO1RX8HcqfOcUviN0enpBaUskSVNL5CYYrjBDsPL3MnBlSnpxRUPs1BD8LCcpQCNnXGIDy7prmShU53DEZiMNJ0lqoRDf2sFqWXKq19CZL+lhUDszFUKNdyZDAJLy7yRChz5+l1Qncm+ly4qZ8uzaw+om5uiA9JI41EEOFkLBpiDBa53Jcy28lHwtZw== x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(9452136761055)(211936372134217)(7411616537696); x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:(6040375)(601004)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(3002001)(10201501046)(6055026)(6041248)(20161123560025)(20161123555025)(20161123562025)(20161123564025)(6042181)(6072148);SRVR:HK2PR06MB1569;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:HK2PR06MB1569; x-forefront-prvs: 0150F3F97D x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM;SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(7916002)(199003)(377454003)(24454002)(13464003)(189002)(8676002)(92566002)(106356001)(105586002)(106116001)(74316002)(305945005)(2900100001)(6506006)(3660700001)(7846002)(68736007)(3280700002)(74482002)(9686002)(122556002)(2906002)(4326007)(189998001)(5001770100001)(50986999)(76176999)(97736004)(54356999)(38730400001)(7696004)(39060400001)(229853002)(5660300001)(76576001)(93886004)(33656002)(7736002)(81156014)(8936002)(81166006)(2950100002)(42882006)(101416001)(6116002)(77096006)(86362001)(102836003)(422495003);DIR:OUT;SFP:1102;SCL:1;SRVR:HK2PR06MB1569;H:HK2PR06MB1569.apcprd06.prod.outlook.com;FPR:;SPF:None;PTR:InfoNoRecords;A:1;MX:1;LANG:en; spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99 spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: fujixerox.co.jp X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 08 Dec 2016 04:12:50.6431 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 176c9cc7-bcae-4c9a-9d8f-1b9322aff6ab X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: HK2PR06MB1569 X-MAIL-FROM: X-SOURCE-IP: [210.173.21.247] X-Spam: exempt Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from base64 to 8bit by mail.home.local id uB84DMJ8000811 Content-Length: 6108 Lines: 168 Dear Shuah, > I noticed that in many places sysfs_attr_init() is called before populating > the fields such as name etc. However, I don't think the order matters. > > sysfs_attr_init() doesn't depend on name or any other fields being set: > > #define sysfs_attr_init(attr) \ > do { \ > static struct lock_class_key __key; \ > \ > (attr)->key = &__key; \ > } while (0) > > Are you concerned about something else? Yes. If the macro name is 'attr_set_key', I don't have any concern. The name is 'attr_init' so I think there's possibility that some other items in attr may initialized in future. Also I think 'initialize struct first, then set items' is idiomatic order. Best Regards, nobuo.iwata // > -----Original Message----- > From: Shuah Khan [mailto:shuahkh@osg.samsung.com] > Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2016 11:51 AM > To: fx IWATA NOBUO; Andrey Konovalov > Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman; Valentina Manea; Shuah Khan; > linux-usb@vger.kernel.org; LKML; Shuah Khan; Shuah Khan > Subject: Re: [PATCH] usbip: fix warning in vhci_hcd_probe/lockdep_init_map > > Hi Nobuo.iwata, > > I noticed that in many places sysfs_attr_init() is called before populating > the fields such as name etc. However, I don't think the order matters. > > sysfs_attr_init() doesn't depend on name or any other fields being set: > > #define sysfs_attr_init(attr) \ > do { \ > static struct lock_class_key __key; \ > \ > (attr)->key = &__key; \ > } while (0) > > Are you concerned about something else? > > thanks, > -- Shuah > > > On 12/07/2016 07:15 PM, fx IWATA NOBUO wrote: > > Dear Shuah, > > > > I'm afraid there's one thing I have concerned. > > > > I think it's better to move sysfs_attr_init() before > > status->attr.attr.name = status->name; > > > > Best Regards, > > > > nobuo.iwata > > // > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: linux-usb-owner@vger.kernel.org > >> [mailto:linux-usb-owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Andrey > >> Konovalov > >> Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2016 9:07 PM > >> To: Shuah Khan > >> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman; Valentina Manea; Shuah Khan; > >> linux-usb@vger.kernel.org; LKML > >> Subject: Re: [PATCH] usbip: fix warning in > >> vhci_hcd_probe/lockdep_init_map > >> > >> On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 9:00 PM, Shuah Khan > wrote: > >>> Hi Andrey, > >>> > >>> On 12/05/2016 12:56 PM, Shuah Khan wrote: > >>>> vhci_hcd calls sysfs_create_group() with dynamically allocated > >>>> sysfs attributes triggering the lock-class key not persistent > >>>> warning. Call > >>>> sysfs_attr_init() for dynamically allocated sysfs attributes to fix > it. > >>>> > >>>> vhci_hcd vhci_hcd: USB/IP Virtual Host Controller vhci_hcd vhci_hcd: > >>>> new USB bus registered, assigned bus number 2 > >>>> BUG: key ffff88006a7e8d18 not in .data! > >>>> ------------[ cut here ]------------ > >>>> WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3131 > >>>> lockdep_init_map+0x60c/0x770 > >>>> DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(1)[ 1.567044] Modules linked in: > >>>> CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.9.0-rc7+ #58 Hardware > >>>> name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011 > >>>> ffff88006bce6eb8 ffffffff81f96c8a ffffffff00000a02 > >>>> 1ffff1000d79cd6a > >>>> ffffed000d79cd62 000000046bce6ed8 0000000041b58ab3 > >>>> ffffffff8598af40 > >>>> ffffffff81f969f8 0000000000000000 0000000041b58ab3 > >>>> 0000000000000200 Call Trace: > >>>> [< inline >] __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:15 > >>>> [] dump_stack+0x292/0x398 lib/dump_stack.c:51 > >>>> [] __warn+0x19f/0x1e0 kernel/panic.c:550 > >>>> [] warn_slowpath_fmt+0xc5/0x110 > >>>> kernel/panic.c:565 [] > >>>> lockdep_init_map+0x60c/0x770 > >>>> kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3131 [] > >>>> __kernfs_create_file+0x114/0x2a0 fs/kernfs/file.c:954 > >> [] sysfs_add_file_mode_ns+0x225/0x520 > >> fs/sysfs/file.c:305 > >>>> [< inline >] create_files fs/sysfs/group.c:64 > >>>> [] internal_create_group+0x239/0x8f0 > >>>> fs/sysfs/group.c:134 [] > >>>> sysfs_create_group+0x1f/0x30 fs/sysfs/group.c:156 > >>>> [] vhci_start+0x5b4/0x7a0 > >>>> drivers/usb/usbip/vhci_hcd.c:978 [] > >>>> usb_add_hcd+0x8da/0x1c60 drivers/usb/core/hcd.c:2867 > >>>> [] vhci_hcd_probe+0x97/0x130 > >>>> drivers/usb/usbip/vhci_hcd.c:1103 > >>>> --- > >>>> --- > >>>> ---[ end trace c33c7b202cf3aac8 ]--- > >>>> > >>>> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan > >>>> Reported-by: Andrey Konovalov > >>> > >>> Here is the fix. Fixed the warning I reproduced on my system. > >>> Let me know if it works for you. > >> > >> Hi Shuah, > >> > >> This fixes the warning I've been seeing. > >> > >> Thanks! > >> > >>> > >>> thanks, > >>> -- Shuah > >>> > >>>> --- > >>>> drivers/usb/usbip/vhci_sysfs.c | 1 + > >>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > >>>> > >>>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/usbip/vhci_sysfs.c > >>>> b/drivers/usb/usbip/vhci_sysfs.c index c404017..b96e5b1 100644 > >>>> --- a/drivers/usb/usbip/vhci_sysfs.c > >>>> +++ b/drivers/usb/usbip/vhci_sysfs.c > >>>> @@ -361,6 +361,7 @@ static void set_status_attr(int id) > >>>> status->attr.attr.name = status->name; > >>>> status->attr.attr.mode = S_IRUGO; > >>>> status->attr.show = status_show; > >>>> + sysfs_attr_init(&status->attr.attr); > >>>> } > >>>> > >>>> static int init_status_attrs(void) > >>>> > >>> > >> -- > >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" > >> in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo > >> info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html