Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3] xen/x86: Increase xen_e820_map to E820_X_MAX
 possible entries
To: Alex Thorlton <athorlton@sgi.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
References: <1479168677-23633-1-git-send-email-athorlton@sgi.com>
 <1480960154-211541-1-git-send-email-athorlton@sgi.com>
Cc: Russ Anderson <rja@sgi.com>, David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
        Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>,
        Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>, x86@kernel.org,
        xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
From: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Message-ID: <ed498aea-127a-246c-79e8-67ade61ba0ce@suse.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2016 06:50:22 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/45.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1480960154-211541-1-git-send-email-athorlton@sgi.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 836
Lines: 23

On 05/12/16 18:49, Alex Thorlton wrote:
> This is the third pass at my patchset to fix up our problems with
> XENMEM_machine_memory_map on large systems.  The only changes on this
> pass were to flesh out the comment above the E820_X_MAX definition, and
> to add Juergen's Reviewed-by to the second patch.
> 
> Let me know if anyone has any questions/comments!
> 
> Alex Thorlton (2):
>   x86: Make E820_X_MAX unconditionally larger than E820MAX
>   xen/x86: Increase xen_e820_map to E820_X_MAX possible entries
> 
>  arch/x86/include/asm/e820.h | 12 ++++++++----
>  arch/x86/xen/setup.c        |  6 +++---
>  2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 

Ingo, do you have any preferences through which tree those patches
should go? I'd like to have at least patch 2 in 4.10, so I could take
it through the Xen tree.


Juergen