Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S932543AbcLIIG6 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Fri, 9 Dec 2016 03:06:58 -0500
Received: from out01.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.231]:59084 "EHLO
        out01.mta.xmission.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1752097AbcLIIG4 (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Fri, 9 Dec 2016 03:06:56 -0500
From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>
Cc: Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@canonical.com>,
        lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, linux-api@vger.kernel.org
References: <20161119151739.GA16398@mail.hallyn.com>
        <87inqvav4y.fsf@xmission.com> <20161208045640.GA433@mail.hallyn.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2016 21:03:51 +1300
In-Reply-To: <20161208045640.GA433@mail.hallyn.com> (Serge E. Hallyn's message
        of "Wed, 7 Dec 2016 22:56:40 -0600")
Message-ID: <87oa0ljzq0.fsf@xmission.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
X-XM-SPF: eid=1cFGCf-00078I-2L;;;mid=<87oa0ljzq0.fsf@xmission.com>;;;hst=in02.mta.xmission.com;;;ip=101.100.131.98;;;frm=ebiederm@xmission.com;;;spf=neutral
X-XM-AID: U2FsdGVkX1/6inG2dcHCWYMlN6UjO46UFJi34Xn8DfE=
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 101.100.131.98
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ebiederm@xmission.com
X-Spam-Report: * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP
        *  0.7 XMSubLong Long Subject
        *  0.0 T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG BODY: No description available.
        *  0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60%
        *      [score: 0.4585]
        * -0.0 DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE Not listed in DCC
        *      [sa07 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1]
X-Spam-DCC: XMission; sa07 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 
X-Spam-Combo: ;"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>
X-Spam-Relay-Country: 
X-Spam-Timing: total 5540 ms - load_scoreonly_sql: 0.04 (0.0%),
        signal_user_changed: 3.7 (0.1%), b_tie_ro: 2.6 (0.0%), parse: 1.07 (0.0%),
        extract_message_metadata: 12 (0.2%), get_uri_detail_list: 0.93 (0.0%),
        tests_pri_-1000: 4.3 (0.1%), tests_pri_-950: 1.15 (0.0%), tests_pri_-900:
        0.95 (0.0%), tests_pri_-400: 18 (0.3%), check_bayes: 17 (0.3%), b_tokenize:
        4.5 (0.1%), b_tok_get_all: 5 (0.1%), b_comp_prob: 1.78 (0.0%),
        b_tok_touch_all: 2.9 (0.1%), b_finish: 0.67 (0.0%), tests_pri_0: 244 (4.4%),
        check_dkim_signature: 0.49 (0.0%), check_dkim_adsp: 2.8 (0.1%),
        tests_pri_500: 5253 (94.8%), poll_dns_idle: 5247 (94.7%), rewrite_mail: 0.00
        (0.0%)
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] user-namespaced file capabilities - now with even more magic
X-Spam-Flag: No
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Thu, 05 May 2016 13:38:54 -0600)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in02.mta.xmission.com)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 890
Lines: 26

"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com> writes:

> On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 05:43:09PM +1300, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com> writes:

>> Any chance of a singed-off-by?
>
> Yes, sorry, Stéphane had pointed out that I'd apparently forgotten to do
> -s.  Do you want me to resend the whole shebang, or does
>
> Signed-off-by: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com>
>
> suffice?  (My previous iterations did have it fwiw so I don't think I could
> legally disavow it now :)

I was really hoping to get this in this for 4.10, but I am seeing a couple
of little things in my review.  Comments referring to a non-existent v4
and a few other niggling little things so I am going to target this for
the next kernel release so there is time review.  With a little luck I
can place this patch in my for-next tree just after the merge window
closes and 4.10-rc1 ships.



Eric