Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261901AbTENCl1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 May 2003 22:41:27 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262225AbTENCl1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 May 2003 22:41:27 -0400 Received: from CPE-24-163-212-250.mn.rr.com ([24.163.212.250]:59523 "EHLO www.enodev.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261901AbTENClQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 May 2003 22:41:16 -0400 Subject: Re: odd db4 error with 2.5.69-mm4 [was Re: Huraaa for 2.5] From: Shawn To: J Sloan Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" In-Reply-To: <1052880432.3569.34.camel@www.enodev.com> References: <1052866461.23191.4.camel@www.enodev.com> <20030514012731.GF8978@holomorphy.com> <1052877161.3569.17.camel@www.enodev.com> <3EC1AAC4.1010104@tmsusa.com> <1052880432.3569.34.camel@www.enodev.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <1052880712.3569.40.camel@www.enodev.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.3.3 (Preview Release) Date: 13 May 2003 21:51:53 -0500 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1931 Lines: 56 Wait a second, there is no .2-1 on redhat. It must be how redhat packages it... Ope, there an email from -wli... Yup, that's the deal. bugzilla.redhat time... On Tue, 2003-05-13 at 21:47, Shawn wrote: > I sure wish I knew what triggers this bug. it worked fine under 2.5.6x > on rh 80 for me. > > Ah crap. I'm running rpm-4.2-0.69 because rhn has been busy. FRICK. > > On Tue, 2003-05-13 at 21:32, J Sloan wrote: > > Shawn wrote: > > > > >Not to get away from the praise too much, but I have a rpm/db4 problem > > >that seems to be related to the kernel. before I started backing out > > >parts of 69-mm4, I just wanted to figure out /which/ parts to try > > >backing out. > > > > > >As root, I basically can't use rpm at all. I think it's select() related > > >as strace shows it timing out. The odd thing is that it works great as a > > >non-privileged user. > > > > > >2.5.69-mm4, otherwise mostly stock rh90 setup. > > > > > > > Just out of curiosity, have you tried: > > > > LD_KERNEL_ASSUME=2.4.1 rpm -qi iptables > > > > OTOH, rpm-4.2-1 seems to "just work" here - > > > > where "here" is of the form: > > > > 2.5.6x on RH9 > > > > Joe > > > > > > > > - > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/