Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2016 07:42:42 -0600
From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>,
        Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@canonical.com>,
        lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, linux-api@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] user-namespaced file capabilities - now with even
 more magic
Message-ID: <20161209134242.GA20577@mail.hallyn.com>
References: <20161119151739.GA16398@mail.hallyn.com>
 <87inqvav4y.fsf@xmission.com>
 <20161208045640.GA433@mail.hallyn.com>
 <87oa0ljzq0.fsf@xmission.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <87oa0ljzq0.fsf@xmission.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1029
Lines: 24

Quoting Eric W. Biederman (ebiederm@xmission.com):
> "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com> writes:
> 
> > On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 05:43:09PM +1300, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> >> "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com> writes:
> 
> >> Any chance of a singed-off-by?
> >
> > Yes, sorry, St?phane had pointed out that I'd apparently forgotten to do
> > -s.  Do you want me to resend the whole shebang, or does
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com>
> >
> > suffice?  (My previous iterations did have it fwiw so I don't think I could
> > legally disavow it now :)
> 
> I was really hoping to get this in this for 4.10, but I am seeing a couple
> of little things in my review.  Comments referring to a non-existent v4
> and a few other niggling little things so I am going to target this for
> the next kernel release so there is time review.  With a little luck I
> can place this patch in my for-next tree just after the merge window
> closes and 4.10-rc1 ships.

Ok, thanks.  This is not something I'd want to rush :)