Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753944AbcLIRGz (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Dec 2016 12:06:55 -0500 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:59202 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752184AbcLIRGx (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Dec 2016 12:06:53 -0500 Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2016 18:06:44 +0100 (CET) From: Miroslav Benes To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" cc: shuah@kernel.org, jeyu@redhat.com, rusty@rustcorp.com.au, ebiederm@xmission.com, dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com, acme@redhat.com, corbet@lwn.net, martin.wilck@suse.com, mmarek@suse.com, pmladek@suse.com, hare@suse.com, rwright@hpe.com, jeffm@suse.com, DSterba@suse.com, fdmanana@suse.com, neilb@suse.com, linux@roeck-us.net, rgoldwyn@suse.com, subashab@codeaurora.org, xypron.glpk@gmx.de, keescook@chromium.org, atomlin@redhat.com, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, dan.j.williams@intel.com, jpoimboe@redhat.com, davem@davemloft.net, mingo@redhat.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC 02/10] module: fix memory leak on early load_module() failures In-Reply-To: <20161208194802.2438-1-mcgrof@kernel.org> Message-ID: References: <20161208184801.1689-1-mcgrof@kernel.org> <20161208194802.2438-1-mcgrof@kernel.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LNX 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2259 Lines: 66 On Thu, 8 Dec 2016, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > While looking for early possible module loading failures I was > able to reproduce a memory leak possible with kmemleak. There > are a few rare ways to trigger a failure: > > o we've run into a failure while processing kernel parameters > (parse_args() returns an error) > o mod_sysfs_setup() fails > o we're a live patch module and copy_module_elf() fails > > Chances of running into this issue is really low. > > kmemleak splat: > > unreferenced object 0xffff9f2c4ada1b00 (size 32): > comm "kworker/u16:4", pid 82, jiffies 4294897636 (age 681.816s) > hex dump (first 32 bytes): > 6d 65 6d 73 74 69 63 6b 30 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 memstick0....... > 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ > backtrace: > [] kmemleak_alloc+0x4a/0xa0 > [] __kmalloc_track_caller+0x126/0x230 > [] kstrdup+0x31/0x60 > [] kstrdup_const+0x24/0x30 > [] kvasprintf_const+0x7a/0x90 > [] kobject_set_name_vargs+0x21/0x90 > [] dev_set_name+0x47/0x50 > [] memstick_check+0x95/0x33c [memstick] > [] process_one_work+0x1f3/0x4b0 > [] worker_thread+0x48/0x4e0 > [] kthread+0xc9/0xe0 > [] ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x40 > [] 0xffffffffffffffff > > Signed-off-by: Luis R. Rodriguez Reviewed-by: Miroslav Benes What about Fixes: e180a6b7759a ("param: fix charp parameters set via sysfs") ? Miroslav > --- > kernel/module.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/kernel/module.c b/kernel/module.c > index f7482db0f843..e420ed67e533 100644 > --- a/kernel/module.c > +++ b/kernel/module.c > @@ -3722,6 +3722,7 @@ static int load_module(struct load_info *info, const char __user *uargs, > mod_sysfs_teardown(mod); > coming_cleanup: > mod->state = MODULE_STATE_GOING; > + destroy_params(mod->kp, mod->num_kp); > blocking_notifier_call_chain(&module_notify_list, > MODULE_STATE_GOING, mod); > klp_module_going(mod); > -- > 2.10.1 >