Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753784AbcLIVm0 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Dec 2016 16:42:26 -0500 Received: from out02.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.232]:50775 "EHLO out02.mta.xmission.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751741AbcLIVmZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Dec 2016 16:42:25 -0500 From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) To: "Serge E. Hallyn" Cc: Seth Forshee , lkml , linux-api@vger.kernel.org References: <20161119151739.GA16398@mail.hallyn.com> <87inqvav4y.fsf@xmission.com> <20161208045640.GA433@mail.hallyn.com> <87oa0ljzq0.fsf@xmission.com> <20161209134242.GA20577@mail.hallyn.com> Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2016 10:39:19 +1300 In-Reply-To: <20161209134242.GA20577@mail.hallyn.com> (Serge E. Hallyn's message of "Fri, 9 Dec 2016 07:42:42 -0600") Message-ID: <878trokcjc.fsf@xmission.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-XM-SPF: eid=1cFSvo-0001sO-Nf;;;mid=<878trokcjc.fsf@xmission.com>;;;hst=in02.mta.xmission.com;;;ip=101.100.131.98;;;frm=ebiederm@xmission.com;;;spf=neutral X-XM-AID: U2FsdGVkX19E7l0YmPLcAfs0y7MOdajVk/75JGigAtc= X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 101.100.131.98 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ebiederm@xmission.com X-Spam-Report: * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * 0.7 XMSubLong Long Subject * 0.0 T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG BODY: No description available. * 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% * [score: 0.4453] * -0.0 DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE Not listed in DCC * [sa04 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1] X-Spam-DCC: XMission; sa04 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Combo: ;"Serge E. Hallyn" X-Spam-Relay-Country: X-Spam-Timing: total 6021 ms - load_scoreonly_sql: 0.05 (0.0%), signal_user_changed: 4.9 (0.1%), b_tie_ro: 3.2 (0.1%), parse: 1.28 (0.0%), extract_message_metadata: 20 (0.3%), get_uri_detail_list: 1.92 (0.0%), tests_pri_-1000: 9 (0.1%), tests_pri_-950: 1.68 (0.0%), tests_pri_-900: 1.26 (0.0%), tests_pri_-400: 24 (0.4%), check_bayes: 23 (0.4%), b_tokenize: 7 (0.1%), b_tok_get_all: 7 (0.1%), b_comp_prob: 2.4 (0.0%), b_tok_touch_all: 3.5 (0.1%), b_finish: 0.84 (0.0%), tests_pri_0: 301 (5.0%), check_dkim_signature: 0.59 (0.0%), check_dkim_adsp: 3.4 (0.1%), tests_pri_500: 5654 (93.9%), poll_dns_idle: 5646 (93.8%), rewrite_mail: 0.00 (0.0%) Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] user-namespaced file capabilities - now with even more magic X-Spam-Flag: No X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Thu, 05 May 2016 13:38:54 -0600) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in02.mta.xmission.com) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1154 Lines: 30 "Serge E. Hallyn" writes: > Quoting Eric W. Biederman (ebiederm@xmission.com): >> "Serge E. Hallyn" writes: >> >> > On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 05:43:09PM +1300, Eric W. Biederman wrote: >> >> "Serge E. Hallyn" writes: >> >> >> Any chance of a singed-off-by? >> > >> > Yes, sorry, Stéphane had pointed out that I'd apparently forgotten to do >> > -s. Do you want me to resend the whole shebang, or does >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Serge Hallyn >> > >> > suffice? (My previous iterations did have it fwiw so I don't think I could >> > legally disavow it now :) >> >> I was really hoping to get this in this for 4.10, but I am seeing a couple >> of little things in my review. Comments referring to a non-existent v4 >> and a few other niggling little things so I am going to target this for >> the next kernel release so there is time review. With a little luck I >> can place this patch in my for-next tree just after the merge window >> closes and 4.10-rc1 ships. > > Ok, thanks. This is not something I'd want to rush :) Sure. This is just something we get merged. Eric