Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2016 00:00:30 +0100 (CET)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, x86@kernel.org,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
        "Charles (Chas) Williams" <ciwillia@brocade.com>,
        "M. Vefa Bicakci" <m.v.b@runbox.com>,
        Alok Kataria <akataria@vmware.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/smpboot: Make logical package management more
 robust
In-Reply-To: <8aa33de4-db18-759b-d2cb-0e25d5ab9d88@oracle.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1612092359550.3612@nanos>
References: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1612081001230.3400@nanos> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1612092305060.3612@nanos> <8aa33de4-db18-759b-d2cb-0e25d5ab9d88@oracle.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 584
Lines: 18

On Fri, 9 Dec 2016, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> On 12/09/2016 05:06 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Thu, 8 Dec 2016, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> >
> > Boris, can you please verify if that makes the
> > topology_update_package_map() call which you placed into the Xen cpu
> > starting code obsolete ?
> 
> Will do. I did test your patch but without removing
> topology_update_package_map() call. It complained about package IDs
> being wrong, but that's expected until I fix Xen part.

That should not longer be the case as I changed the approach to that
management thing.

Thanks,

	tglx