Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261169AbTENHot (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 May 2003 03:44:49 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261175AbTENHot (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 May 2003 03:44:49 -0400 Received: from marstons.services.quay.plus.net ([212.159.14.223]:34029 "HELO marstons.services.quay.plus.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S261169AbTENHoq (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 May 2003 03:44:46 -0400 From: "Riley Williams" To: "jw schultz" Cc: Subject: RE: What exactly does "supports Linux" mean? Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 08:57:28 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <20030514021210.GD30766@pegasys.ws> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3103 Lines: 93 Hi. > This is really a trademark related labelling issue. The trademark > allows Linus or his assignee to specify in what way Linux (tm) may > be used in labelling and advertising. Linux is just like other > products with third-party parts and supplies. If Linus's assignee > (Linux international?) where to specify explicit guidelines then > people would know what to expect. Something like: > > Linux certified: > The mainline kernel has a driver and it has been certified > as functioning with this hardware by OSDL or some other > officially sanctioned lab. > > Linux supported: > The mainline kernel has a driver. Fine so far. > Linux compatible: > Source code driver is available as a patch. In other words, if a patch is available for the 1.0.0 kernel, they can claim "Linux compatible" ??? That's meaningless...replace with something like... Linux 2.2.2 compatible: Source code driver is available as a patch for the stated mainline kernel. ...with the specific version to be made explicit. As a minimum, it needs to state the actual kernel series the patch is for. > Runs on Linux: > A binary only driver is available that can be used with > mainline kernel. Similar comments apply. Again, require that the kernel that driver works with is made explicit. > Supports Linux: > A portion of the purchase price will be donated to > Linux International. So a company provides a product for $5,000.00 and donates $0.01 of the purchase price to the specified organisation, thus entitling themselves to say "Supports Linux" by this rule. Can I suggest this alternative definition: Supports Linux: At least 1% of the purchase price will be donated to Linux International. > You will notice this all relates to mainline kernels (Linus and > Marcello). If the product requires a vendor kernel they need to > negotiate with the vendor to say so. Agreed. > These are just suggestions. Many other products (including MS > windows) have similar labelling restrictions, often with logos. > Use of the term "Linux" in packaging or advertising or products > inconsistent with the official designations would be trademark > infringement. Agreed. > Different rules would apply to products that exist strictly in > user-space. That's not necessary - just define: Runs under Linux: This product work on a system based on a mainline Linux kernel without making any modification to the kernel itself or loading any kernel modules. That is all that is required there. Best wishes from Riley. --- * Nothing as pretty as a smile, nothing as ugly as a frown. --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.481 / Virus Database: 277 - Release Date: 13-May-2003 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/