Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750991AbcLLFVh (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Dec 2016 00:21:37 -0500 Received: from mail-yw0-f176.google.com ([209.85.161.176]:33878 "EHLO mail-yw0-f176.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750710AbcLLFVg (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Dec 2016 00:21:36 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20161201214604.20717-2-robert.foss@collabora.com> References: <20161201214604.20717-1-robert.foss@collabora.com> <20161201214604.20717-2-robert.foss@collabora.com> From: Baolin Wang Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2016 13:21:34 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/2] usb: xhci: plat: Enable runtime PM To: Robert Foss Cc: mathias.nyman@intel.com, Greg KH , Julius Werner , Andrew Bresticker , Felipe Balbi , Brian Norris , LKML Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2886 Lines: 97 Hi Robert, On 2 December 2016 at 05:46, Robert Foss wrote: > Enable runtime PM for the xhci-plat device so that the parent device > may implement runtime PM. > > Signed-off-by: Robert Foss > > Tested-by: Robert Foss > --- > drivers/usb/host/xhci-plat.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- > 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-plat.c b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-plat.c > index ed56bf9ed885..ba4efe74f537 100644 > --- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-plat.c > +++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-plat.c > @@ -246,6 +246,9 @@ static int xhci_plat_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > if (ret) > goto dealloc_usb2_hcd; > > + pm_runtime_set_active(&pdev->dev); > + pm_runtime_enable(&pdev->dev); You did not implement the runtime callbacks of xHCI device, then how can the parent device control the resume/suspend of xHCI device by runtime PM mechanism? Could you see my previous patch which implement the runtime callbacks for xHCI device? https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/11/28/25 > + > return 0; > > > @@ -274,6 +277,8 @@ static int xhci_plat_remove(struct platform_device *dev) > struct xhci_hcd *xhci = hcd_to_xhci(hcd); > struct clk *clk = xhci->clk; > > + pm_runtime_disable(&dev->dev); > + > usb_remove_hcd(xhci->shared_hcd); > usb_phy_shutdown(hcd->usb_phy); > > @@ -292,6 +297,13 @@ static int xhci_plat_suspend(struct device *dev) > { > struct usb_hcd *hcd = dev_get_drvdata(dev); > struct xhci_hcd *xhci = hcd_to_xhci(hcd); > + int ret; > + > + ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(dev); > + if (ret < 0) { > + pm_runtime_put(dev); > + return ret; > + } > > /* > * xhci_suspend() needs `do_wakeup` to know whether host is allowed > @@ -301,15 +313,28 @@ static int xhci_plat_suspend(struct device *dev) > * reconsider this when xhci_plat_suspend enlarges its scope, e.g., > * also applies to runtime suspend. > */ > - return xhci_suspend(xhci, device_may_wakeup(dev)); > + ret = xhci_suspend(xhci, device_may_wakeup(dev)); > + pm_runtime_put(dev); > + > + return ret; > } > > static int xhci_plat_resume(struct device *dev) > { > struct usb_hcd *hcd = dev_get_drvdata(dev); > struct xhci_hcd *xhci = hcd_to_xhci(hcd); > + int ret; > > - return xhci_resume(xhci, 0); > + ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(dev); > + if (ret < 0) { > + pm_runtime_put(dev); > + return ret; > + } > + > + ret = xhci_resume(xhci, 0); > + pm_runtime_put(dev); > + > + return ret; > } > > static const struct dev_pm_ops xhci_plat_pm_ops = { > -- > 2.11.0 > -- Baolin.wang Best Regards