Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2016 07:54:54 +0000
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
To: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>
Cc: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
        Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitchen@atmel.com>,
        Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>,
        Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
        Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>,
        David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
        Peter Tyser <ptyser@xes-inc.com>, key.seong.lim@intel.com,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/3] spi-nor: Add support for Intel SPI serial flash
 controller
Message-ID: <20161212075454.GR3625@dell.home>
References: <20161205112727.GI1459@lahna.fi.intel.com>
 <2dac1535-de7f-47c3-2747-ba8cac854811@gmail.com>
 <20161205163106.GJ1459@lahna.fi.intel.com>
 <62db8daa-7ebf-1a42-bd70-897c3c636e3c@atmel.com>
 <20161206094525.GA25385@dell.home>
 <20161207085330.GN1459@lahna.fi.intel.com>
 <0695162f-0959-ab2c-4e68-14881e386060@gmail.com>
 <20161209085753.GC3625@dell.home>
 <20161209122541.GN1501@lahna.fi.intel.com>
 <c06ebcda-5c64-8e5c-0616-647b784210d4@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <c06ebcda-5c64-8e5c-0616-647b784210d4@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.2 (2016-07-01)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1476
Lines: 40

On Fri, 09 Dec 2016, Marek Vasut wrote:

> On 12/09/2016 01:25 PM, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 09, 2016 at 08:57:53AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> >> On Wed, 07 Dec 2016, Marek Vasut wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 12/07/2016 09:53 AM, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> >>>> On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 09:45:25AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> >>>>> I'm happy either way.  However if you take them, I will require a
> >>>>> pull-request to an immutable branch containing only these patches.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> If I take them, it won't be until v4.11, since we are half way though
> >>>>> -rc8 already and I would like them to soak in -next for at least a
> >>>>> couple of weeks.
> >>>>
> >>>> This series already missed v4.8 and v4.9 so I don't think there is a
> >>>> rush to get it for v4.10 either ;-) I'm fine if it goes for v4.11.
> >>>
> >>> Hmmmmmmmmmmm, that kinda sucks. Lee, are you positive this isn't 4.10
> >>> material ?
> >>
> >> The merge-window opens in 2 days.
> >>
> >> As I mentioned, I like patches to reside in -next for at least 1 maybe
> >> 2 RC cycles before merging.  It's far to easy to accept code, then get
> >> bitten if/when it breaks after being merged by Linus.
> > 
> > I agree. Better to give it some time in linux-next.
> > 
> > Can you queue this series for v4.11?
> 
> OK, I'm fine with this.

Yes, no problem.

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog