Message-ID: <1481530466.3372.1.camel@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the vfs tree
From: Ian Kent <ikent@redhat.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
        Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2016 16:14:26 +0800
In-Reply-To: <20161212165207.48c149de@canb.auug.org.au>
References: <20161212165207.48c149de@canb.auug.org.au>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1454
Lines: 36

On Mon, 2016-12-12 at 16:52 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Al let me know that he had put a newer version of the autofs patches
> into his vfs tree, so I have dropped the following patches from the akpm
> tree today:
> 
>   vfs: change d_manage() to take a struct path
>   vfs: add path_is_mountpoint() helper
>   vfs: fix boolreturn.cocci warnings
>   vfs: add path_has_submounts()
>   autofs: change autofs4_expire_wait() to take struct path
>   autofs: change autofs4_wait() to take struct path
>   autofs: use path_is_mountpoint() to fix unreliable d_mountpoint() checks
>   autofs: use path_has_submounts() to fix unreliable have_submount() checks
>   vfs: remove unused have_submounts() function
>   vfs: merge path_is_mountpoint() and path_is_mountpoint_rcu()
>   autofs: make struct path const in autofs4_dir_open()
>   autofs: change struct path to const in autofs4_expire_wait() and
> autofs4_wait()
>   vfs: change struct path to const in d_manage()
>   vfs: constify path parameter of path_has_submounts()
>   autofs: don't hold spinlock over direct mount expire
>   vfs: make may_umount_tree() mount propagation aware
>   vfs-make-may_umount_tree-mount-propogation-aware-checkpatch-fixes
> 
> I hope that was the correct ones.

Hi Stephen,

Yes, Al merged a number of the patches, fixed a couple of problems, and rejected
one which I'm still working on.

The list looks right to me.
That's great, thanks,
Ian