Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754146AbcLLRuy (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Dec 2016 12:50:54 -0500 Received: from bh-25.webhostbox.net ([208.91.199.152]:37789 "EHLO bh-25.webhostbox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752879AbcLLRuw (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Dec 2016 12:50:52 -0500 Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2016 09:50:50 -0800 From: Guenter Roeck To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Stafford Horne , Linux Kernel Mailing List , openrisc@lists.librecores.org Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Openrisc changes for 4.10 merge Message-ID: <20161212175050.GB29734@roeck-us.net> References: <20161212143856.GA2650@lianli.shorne-pla.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-Authenticated_sender: guenter@roeck-us.net X-OutGoing-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - bh-25.webhostbox.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - vger.kernel.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - roeck-us.net X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: bh-25.webhostbox.net: authenticated_id: guenter@roeck-us.net X-Authenticated-Sender: bh-25.webhostbox.net: guenter@roeck-us.net X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1296 Lines: 31 On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 09:05:36AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 6:38 AM, Stafford Horne wrote: > > > > - This is my first pull request as the new OpenRISC architecture > > maintainer. I hope I have things in order. > > Looks ok, but I note that I don't seem to find an email talking about > the maintainership change. > > In general, I really prefer seeing hand-off. I guess in this case > there wasn't all that much hand-off to be done, but I think the last > few changes came from pulling from Guenter.. > Hi Linus, sorry for not keeping you in the loop. No bad intentions, I just know that you are busy. I knew about this change, and I had offered to send the pull request. Stafford wanted to do it himself, so I figured I'd only (need to) get involved if needed. I had a look through the changes, ran a diff against mainline, and tested the resulting code in qemu. I did this both with the previous version and with the version rebased to v4.9. I even checked that Stafford now has his key signed. It all looks ok to me. Please consider this a Tested-by: and Reviewed-by: from me for the entire series. Now all we have left to do is to ask Stafford not to rebase to the latest kernel before sending his pull requests... Thanks, Guenter