Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2016 10:54:47 -0700
From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com>,
        Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] doc: Explain light-handed markup preference a bit
 better
Message-ID: <20161212105447.25d1ffe7@lwn.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAKMK7uFhDe5gKTK9SsNhy9ipdXPfA=-BYNBac+7N-gO_Wcat=A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20161207154258.23333-1-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
        <20161207123924.4a47d777@lwn.net>
        <20161208071021.5cd73ec8@vento.lan>
        <CAKMK7uFhDe5gKTK9SsNhy9ipdXPfA=-BYNBac+7N-gO_Wcat=A@mail.gmail.com>
Organization: LWN.net
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 445
Lines: 13

On Thu, 8 Dec 2016 23:06:57 +0100
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> wrote:

> Hm yeah, separate conversion section makes sense. In that case I'll
> adopt Jani's suggestion for more terseness in overview document, and
> we can merge Mauro's proposal (or something like it) on top. And I'll
> try to rebase onto latest doc-next too ;-)
> 
> Does that sound like a plan, before I head of and respin v4?

It sounds like a good plan to me.

jon