Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753736AbcLLSVl convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Dec 2016 13:21:41 -0500 Received: from out03.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.233]:54078 "EHLO out03.mta.xmission.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752430AbcLLSVj (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Dec 2016 13:21:39 -0500 From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) To: "Michael Kerrisk \(man-pages\)" Cc: Andrei Vagin , Containers , Linux API , lkml , "linux-fsdevel\@vger.kernel.org" , James Bottomley , "W. Trevor King" , Alexander Viro , "Serge E. Hallyn" References: <87poky5ca9.fsf@xmission.com> <6771af94-9847-0277-ec1d-62bc3649a17a@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2016 07:18:27 +1300 In-Reply-To: <6771af94-9847-0277-ec1d-62bc3649a17a@gmail.com> (Michael Kerrisk's message of "Mon, 12 Dec 2016 17:01:14 +0100") Message-ID: <87r35df1u4.fsf@xmission.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-XM-SPF: eid=1cGVEE-0002Fz-1N;;;mid=<87r35df1u4.fsf@xmission.com>;;;hst=in01.mta.xmission.com;;;ip=101.100.131.98;;;frm=ebiederm@xmission.com;;;spf=neutral X-XM-AID: U2FsdGVkX1/ntcp/LNFAoRsc9in9kp1gjb9jaoPM/vY= X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 101.100.131.98 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ebiederm@xmission.com X-Spam-Report: * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * 0.7 XMSubLong Long Subject * 0.0 T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG BODY: No description available. * 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% * [score: 0.5000] * -0.0 DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE Not listed in DCC * [sa07 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1] X-Spam-DCC: XMission; sa07 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Combo: ;"Michael Kerrisk \(man-pages\)" X-Spam-Relay-Country: X-Spam-Timing: total 300 ms - load_scoreonly_sql: 0.05 (0.0%), signal_user_changed: 3.7 (1.2%), b_tie_ro: 2.6 (0.9%), parse: 0.88 (0.3%), extract_message_metadata: 3.7 (1.2%), get_uri_detail_list: 1.94 (0.6%), tests_pri_-1000: 4.0 (1.3%), tests_pri_-950: 1.14 (0.4%), tests_pri_-900: 0.97 (0.3%), tests_pri_-400: 30 (10.0%), check_bayes: 29 (9.6%), b_tokenize: 10 (3.4%), b_tok_get_all: 11 (3.7%), b_comp_prob: 2.3 (0.8%), b_tok_touch_all: 2.5 (0.8%), b_finish: 0.64 (0.2%), tests_pri_0: 244 (81.3%), check_dkim_signature: 0.85 (0.3%), check_dkim_adsp: 3.2 (1.1%), tests_pri_500: 3.6 (1.2%), rewrite_mail: 0.00 (0.0%) Subject: Re: Documenting the ioctl interfaces to discover relationships between namespaces X-Spam-Flag: No X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Thu, 05 May 2016 13:38:54 -0600) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in01.mta.xmission.com) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3511 Lines: 78 "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" writes: > On 12/11/2016 11:30 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote: >> "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" writes: >> >>> [was: [PATCH 0/4 v3] Add an interface to discover relationships >>> between namespaces] >> >> One small comment below. >> >>> >>> Introspecting namespace relationships >>> Since Linux 4.9, two ioctl(2) operations are provided to allow >>> introspection of namespace relationships (see user_namespaces(7) >>> and pid_namespaces(7)). The form of the calls is: >>> >>> ioctl(fd, request); >>> >>> In each case, fd refers to a /proc/[pid]/ns/* file. >>> >>> NS_GET_USERNS >>> Returns a file descriptor that refers to the owning user >>> namespace for the namespace referred to by fd. >>> >>> NS_GET_PARENT >>> Returns a file descriptor that refers to the parent names‐ >>> pace of the namespace referred to by fd. This operation is >>> valid only for hierarchical namespaces (i.e., PID and user >>> namespaces). For user namespaces, NS_GET_PARENT is synony‐ >>> mous with NS_GET_USERNS. >>> >>> In each case, the returned file descriptor is opened with O_RDONLY >>> and O_CLOEXEC (close-on-exec). >>> >>> By applying fstat(2) to the returned file descriptor, one obtains >>> a stat structure whose st_ino (inode number) field identifies the >>> owning/parent namespace. This inode number can be matched with >>> the inode number of another /proc/[pid]/ns/{pid,user} file to >>> determine whether that is the owning/parent namespace. >> >> Like all fstat inode comparisons to be fully accurate you need to >> compare both the st_ino and st_dev. I reserve the right for st_dev to >> be significant when comparing namespaces. Otherwise I might have to >> create a namespace of namespaces someday and that is ugly. >> >>> Either of these ioctl(2) operations can fail with the following >>> error: >>> >>> EPERM The requested namespace is outside of the caller's names‐ >>> pace scope. This error can occur if, for example, the own‐ >>> ing user namespace is an ancestor of the caller's current >>> user namespace. It can also occur on attempts to obtain >>> the parent of the initial user or PID namespace. >>> >>> Additionally, the NS_GET_PARENT operation can fail with the fol‐ >>> lowing error: >>> >>> EINVAL fd refers to a nonhierarchical namespace. >>> >>> See the EXAMPLE section for an example of the use of these opera‐ >>> tions. > > So, after playing with this a bit, I have a question. > > I gather that in order to, for example, elaborate the tree of user > namespaces on the system, one would use NS_GET_PARENT on each of > the /proc/*/ns/user files and match up the results. Right? > > What happens if one of the parent user namespaces contains no > processes? That is, the parent namespace exists by virtue of being > pinned because a proc/PID/ns/user file is open or bind mounted. > (Chrome seems to do this sort of dance with user namespaces, for > example.) How do we find the ancestor of *that* user namespace? What is returned from NS_GET_USERNS and NS_GET_PARENT is a file descriptor, that you can call NS_GET_PARENT on. Eric