Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262176AbTENN2Z (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 May 2003 09:28:25 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262185AbTENN2Z (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 May 2003 09:28:25 -0400 Received: from prv-tm12.provo.novell.com ([192.108.102.142]:30093 "EHLO smtp-send.myrealbox.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262176AbTENN2X convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 May 2003 09:28:23 -0400 Subject: Re: supermount From: "ismail donmez" To: gutko@poczta.onet.pl CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 07:41:06 -0600 X-Mailer: NetMail ModWeb Module MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <1052919666.273b9220kde@smtp-send.myrealbox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-9" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 620 Lines: 17 Yeah I wonder the same for some time . Is there a good reason not to include supermount in kernel? -----Original Message----- From: Maciej Górnicki To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 18:30:02 +0200 Subject: supermount Hello, Why supermount code is not included in kernel? It's maintained by Juan Jose Quintela from Mandrake... - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/