Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933045AbcLMLlG (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Dec 2016 06:41:06 -0500 Received: from mail-wj0-f196.google.com ([209.85.210.196]:35322 "EHLO mail-wj0-f196.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933008AbcLMLk7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Dec 2016 06:40:59 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/3] spi-nor: Add support for Intel SPI serial flash controller To: Lee Jones References: <20161205112727.GI1459@lahna.fi.intel.com> <2dac1535-de7f-47c3-2747-ba8cac854811@gmail.com> <20161205163106.GJ1459@lahna.fi.intel.com> <62db8daa-7ebf-1a42-bd70-897c3c636e3c@atmel.com> <20161206094525.GA25385@dell.home> <20161207085330.GN1459@lahna.fi.intel.com> <0695162f-0959-ab2c-4e68-14881e386060@gmail.com> <20161209085753.GC3625@dell.home> <20161209122541.GN1501@lahna.fi.intel.com> <20161212075454.GR3625@dell.home> Cc: Mika Westerberg , Cyrille Pitchen , Boris Brezillon , Richard Weinberger , Brian Norris , David Woodhouse , Peter Tyser , key.seong.lim@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org From: Marek Vasut Message-ID: Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2016 08:53:45 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20161212075454.GR3625@dell.home> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1425 Lines: 41 On 12/12/2016 08:54 AM, Lee Jones wrote: > On Fri, 09 Dec 2016, Marek Vasut wrote: > >> On 12/09/2016 01:25 PM, Mika Westerberg wrote: >>> On Fri, Dec 09, 2016 at 08:57:53AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote: >>>> On Wed, 07 Dec 2016, Marek Vasut wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 12/07/2016 09:53 AM, Mika Westerberg wrote: >>>>>> On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 09:45:25AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote: >>>>>>> I'm happy either way. However if you take them, I will require a >>>>>>> pull-request to an immutable branch containing only these patches. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> If I take them, it won't be until v4.11, since we are half way though >>>>>>> -rc8 already and I would like them to soak in -next for at least a >>>>>>> couple of weeks. >>>>>> >>>>>> This series already missed v4.8 and v4.9 so I don't think there is a >>>>>> rush to get it for v4.10 either ;-) I'm fine if it goes for v4.11. >>>>> >>>>> Hmmmmmmmmmmm, that kinda sucks. Lee, are you positive this isn't 4.10 >>>>> material ? >>>> >>>> The merge-window opens in 2 days. >>>> >>>> As I mentioned, I like patches to reside in -next for at least 1 maybe >>>> 2 RC cycles before merging. It's far to easy to accept code, then get >>>> bitten if/when it breaks after being merged by Linus. >>> >>> I agree. Better to give it some time in linux-next. >>> >>> Can you queue this series for v4.11? >> >> OK, I'm fine with this. > > Yes, no problem. > Cool, thanks ! -- Best regards, Marek Vasut