Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932995AbcLMNiV convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Dec 2016 08:38:21 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:38736 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932564AbcLMNiT (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Dec 2016 08:38:19 -0500 Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903 From: David Howells In-Reply-To: References: <51643019-bb42-4066-c824-c55b9e668ac6@man7.org> <25262.1481628931@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <9f32a79b-5795-bff4-b741-bf927a525149@gmail.com> To: mtk.manpages@gmail.com Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, Michael Kerrisk , lkml , Eugene Syromyatnikov , keyrings@vger.kernel.org, linux-man Subject: Re: Revised keyrings(7) man page for review MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2016 13:38:16 +0000 Message-ID: <26913.1481636296@warthog.procyon.org.uk> X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.26]); Tue, 13 Dec 2016 13:38:19 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1692 Lines: 35 Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote: > So, I've updated this piece a couple of times since the draft that you > reviewed, and by now it reads: > > "big_key" (since Linux 3.13) > This key type is similar to the "user" key type, but it may > hold a payload of up to 1 MiB in size. This key type is > useful for tasks such as holding Kerberos ticket caches. I'm not sure that "tasks" is quite the word I'd use here (it's overloaded). Perhaps "purposes"? > The payload data may be stored in the swap space rather > than in kernel memory if the data size exceeds the overhead > of storing the data encrypted in swap space. (A tmpfs file > is used, which requires filesystem structures to be allo‐ > cated in the kernel; The size of these structures deter‐ > mines the size threshold above which the tmpfs storage > method is used.) Since Linux 4.8, payload data is > encrypted, to prevent it being written unencrypted into > swap space. I would either drop the first "encrypted" ("storing the data encrypted") since you mention this later or move it earlier to be after the word "stored" ("may be stored encrypted"). Note that with the "Since Linux 4.8 ..." sentence, the encryption is only applied if it is stored into tmpfs. Also, the payload isn't directly stored into swapspace, but is rather stored into tmpfs, from where it can be swapped. This is important since you can use this type of key without any swapspace available to your system. David