Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262351AbTENSJN (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 May 2003 14:09:13 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262636AbTENSJN (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 May 2003 14:09:13 -0400 Received: from fmr06.intel.com ([134.134.136.7]:59588 "EHLO caduceus.jf.intel.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262351AbTENSJN convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 May 2003 14:09:13 -0400 Message-ID: From: "Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky" To: "'Shaheed R. Haque'" , "'Zwane Mwaikambo'" Cc: "Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky" , "'Andrew Morton'" , "'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org'" Subject: RE: 2.6 must-fix list, v2 Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 11:21:29 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 745 Lines: 19 -----Original Message----- > From: Shaheed R. Haque [mailto:srhaque@iee.org] > > Can I be certain that there is no shared lock or anything else in the whole > kernel? No, but I'm prepared to make that probabalistic tradeoff (backed via > extensive testing) rather than have to go to hard-realtime. An of course, when you pin one of those, you try to "fix it", so to improve the time response of the kernel ... I?aky P?rez-Gonz?lez -- Not speaking for Intel -- all opinions are my own (and my fault) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/