Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 26 Feb 2001 19:11:23 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 26 Feb 2001 19:11:14 -0500 Received: from pizda.ninka.net ([216.101.162.242]:45215 "EHLO pizda.ninka.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 26 Feb 2001 19:11:04 -0500 From: "David S. Miller" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15002.61250.224811.987948@pizda.ninka.net> Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2001 16:05:22 -0800 (PST) To: "Benjamin C.R. LaHaise" Cc: michael@linuxmagic.com, Jan Rekorajski , Chris Wedgwood , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com, waltje@uWalt.NL.Mugnet.ORG Subject: Re: [UPDATE] zerocopy.. While working on ip.h stuff In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: <15002.58854.215318.882641@pizda.ninka.net> X-Mailer: VM 6.75 under 21.1 (patch 13) "Crater Lake" XEmacs Lucid Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Benjamin C.R. LaHaise writes: > Since the ip header fits in the cache of some CPUs (like the P4), > this becoming a cheaper operation than ever before. At gigapacket rates, it becomes an issue. This guy is talking about tinkering with new IP _options_, not just the header. So even if the IP header itself fits totally in a cache line, the options afterwardsd likely will not and thus require another cache miss. Later, David S. Miller davem@redhat.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/