Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932680AbcLNRJN (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Dec 2016 12:09:13 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:51876 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756404AbcLNRJK (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Dec 2016 12:09:10 -0500 Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903 From: David Howells In-Reply-To: References: <627e948e37314c13a67c90917386c814c56b8e20.1481683609.git.luto@kernel.org> <18039.1481704679@warthog.procyon.org.uk> To: Andy Lutomirski Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, Andy Lutomirski , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , USB list , keyrings@vger.kernel.org, Eric Biggers , linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, Herbert Xu , Stephan Mueller Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] keys/encrypted: Fix two crypto-on-the-stack bugs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <3737.1481734853.1@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2016 17:00:53 +0000 Message-ID: <3738.1481734853@warthog.procyon.org.uk> X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.38]); Wed, 14 Dec 2016 17:00:56 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 205 Lines: 8 Andy Lutomirski wrote: > David, are these encrypted keys ever exported anywhere? If not, could > the code use a mode that doesn't need padding? ecryptfs uses them, I think. David