Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S933635AbcLNRUY (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Wed, 14 Dec 2016 12:20:24 -0500
Received: from out03.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.233]:57780 "EHLO
        out03.mta.xmission.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S933087AbcLNRUV (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Wed, 14 Dec 2016 12:20:21 -0500
From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, ast@fb.com,
        lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, acme@kernel.org,
        alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, mingo@redhat.com,
        daniel@iogearbox.net, rostedt@goodmis.org,
        Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        sargun@sargun.me, Aravinda Prasad <aravinda@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        brendan.d.gregg@gmail.com
References: <148156671980.4651.13017595439842763683.stgit@hbathini.in.ibm.com>
        <148156680219.4651.12310355352884515738.stgit@hbathini.in.ibm.com>
        <878trkajlc.fsf@xmission.com>
        <4c6c4754-6a87-56bc-3351-fef699cc57e1@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
        <87inqnfvr8.fsf@xmission.com>
        <20161214082415.GM3124@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2016 04:52:30 +1300
In-Reply-To: <20161214082415.GM3124@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (Peter
        Zijlstra's message of "Wed, 14 Dec 2016 09:24:15 +0100")
Message-ID: <87k2b233up.fsf@xmission.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-XM-SPF: eid=1cHBuF-0003dt-PD;;;mid=<87k2b233up.fsf@xmission.com>;;;hst=in01.mta.xmission.com;;;ip=101.100.131.98;;;frm=ebiederm@xmission.com;;;spf=neutral
X-XM-AID: U2FsdGVkX18SmNIo//0hqWfSBHJaCftlnH6kJEl3Kv8=
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 101.100.131.98
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ebiederm@xmission.com
X-Spam-Report: * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP
        *  0.7 XMSubLong Long Subject
        *  0.0 T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG BODY: No description available.
        * -0.0 BAYES_40 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 20 to 40%
        *      [score: 0.3147]
        * -0.0 DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE Not listed in DCC
        *      [sa06 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1]
X-Spam-DCC: XMission; sa06 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 
X-Spam-Combo: ;Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
X-Spam-Relay-Country: 
X-Spam-Timing: total 5541 ms - load_scoreonly_sql: 0.03 (0.0%),
        signal_user_changed: 6 (0.1%), b_tie_ro: 4.8 (0.1%), parse: 1.06 (0.0%),
        extract_message_metadata: 10 (0.2%), get_uri_detail_list: 0.54 (0.0%),
        tests_pri_-1000: 4.6 (0.1%), tests_pri_-950: 1.19 (0.0%), tests_pri_-900:
        0.99 (0.0%), tests_pri_-400: 19 (0.3%), check_bayes: 17 (0.3%), b_tokenize:
        4.8 (0.1%), b_tok_get_all: 6 (0.1%), b_comp_prob: 1.57 (0.0%),
        b_tok_touch_all: 2.8 (0.0%), b_finish: 0.75 (0.0%), tests_pri_0: 403 (7.3%),
        check_dkim_signature: 0.46 (0.0%), check_dkim_adsp: 3.0 (0.1%),
        tests_pri_500: 5093 (91.9%), poll_dns_idle: 5087 (91.8%), rewrite_mail: 0.00
        (0.0%)
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] perf tool: add cgroup identifier entry in perf report
X-Spam-Flag: No
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Thu, 05 May 2016 13:38:54 -0600)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in01.mta.xmission.com)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 483
Lines: 14

Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> writes:

> On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 08:56:43AM +1300, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> 
>> I would just make the identifier a structure containing the
>> device number and the inode number.  It didn't look like perf required
>> the identifier to be a simple integer.
>
> Right, perf doesn't care at all here, its just a transport.

perf report?  In that case I think perf cares enough to know there is
some identifier it is reporting things by.

Eric