Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262742AbTENUlq (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 May 2003 16:41:46 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262818AbTENUlq (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 May 2003 16:41:46 -0400 Received: from neon-gw-l3.transmeta.com ([63.209.4.196]:264 "EHLO neon-gw.transmeta.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262742AbTENUlp (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 May 2003 16:41:45 -0400 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.5.68 FUTEX support should be optional Date: 14 May 2003 13:54:09 -0700 Organization: Transmeta Corporation, Santa Clara CA Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Disclaimer: Not speaking for Transmeta in any way, shape, or form. Copyright: Copyright 2003 H. Peter Anvin - All Rights Reserved Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 904 Lines: 21 Followup to: By author: Davide Libenzi In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel > > Not only. Like Ulrich was saying, the config documentation should heavily > warn the wild config guy about the consequences of a 'NO' over there. > How about creating a master option like we have for experimental? Something like "Allow removal of essential components?" (CONFIG_EMBEDDED) -hpa -- at work, in private! "Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot." Architectures needed: ia64 m68k mips64 ppc ppc64 s390 s390x sh v850 x86-64 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/