Subject: Re: 2.6 must-fix list, v2
From: Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>
To: shaheed <srhaque@iee.org>
Cc: Felipe Alfaro Solana <yo@felipe-alfaro.com>,
       Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <200305142201.59912.srhaque@iee.org>
References: <1050146434.3e97f68300fff@netmail.pipex.net>
	 <1052910149.586.3.camel@teapot.felipe-alfaro.com>
	 <1052927975.883.9.camel@icbm>  <200305142201.59912.srhaque@iee.org>
Content-Type: text/plain
Message-Id: <1052946917.883.25.camel@icbm>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Date: 14 May 2003 17:15:18 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1132
Lines: 25

On Wed, 2003-05-14 at 17:01, shaheed wrote:

> Ah. I think I misread your previous note to me on this...that's why my patch 
> modifies init itself (it does not muck with the syscall in any way). I'll try 
> this as soon as I have my 2.5 multiprocessor back. BTW: what are the plans 
> for getting schedutils (and specifically taskset) into a normal 2.6-based 
> distribution? Can I be reasonably sure that this will happen?

I think it is in Debian (unstable at least).

More important to me is getting it into Red Hat and SuSE. I have heard
encouring words from Matt Wilson at Red Hat about schedutils possibly
going into Rawhide soon. It would not hurt to let Red Hat/SuSE/whoever
know that schedutils is something their customers want.

Both Red Hat and SuSE's kernels have the CPU affinity system calls
merged, so you do not need to wait until 2.6 is out to use them.

	Robert Love

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/