Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262945AbTENV66 (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 May 2003 17:58:58 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262642AbTENV66 (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 May 2003 17:58:58 -0400 Received: from smtpzilla3.xs4all.nl ([194.109.127.139]:17165 "EHLO smtpzilla3.xs4all.nl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262945AbTENV65 (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 May 2003 17:58:57 -0400 Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 00:11:39 +0200 (CEST) From: Roman Zippel X-X-Sender: roman@serv To: Andreas Schwab cc: Miles Bader , Subject: Re: [PATCH] new kconfig goodies In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20030513211749.GA340@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 732 Lines: 21 Hi, On Wed, 14 May 2003, Andreas Schwab wrote: > |> But I'm open to suggestions for a better name, "select" might be a good > |> alternative. Other ideas? Opinions? > > How about "override"? Hmm, I think it doesn't really fit, it's a bit more than this, e.g. if one option is set 'm', the other option can still be set to 'm' or 'y'. The logic is basically "if this option is selected, automatically select this other option too.", so currently I like "select" best. bye, Roman - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/